Discussion about this post

User's avatar
REWiRED - by Anca P Trifan's avatar

David, this is a worthwhile series because it asks a question our industry has avoided for too long: who will hold the leverage around the gathering economy in 2036?

I agree with much of the direction you map here, especially the pressure toward venue consolidation, more rigorous economic-impact reporting, cognitive-load-aware environments, and a technology market that keeps reducing buyers’ room to negotiate.

Where I land differently is on ownership itself. A venue group can own properties. A platform can own a workflow. An AI company can own the model layer. None of them fully owns the room while organizers retain the ability to move their data, understand the terms, challenge automated recommendations, preserve alternatives, and keep a named human accountable for consequential decisions.

The danger is not simply consolidation. It is buyers accepting convenience without portability, visibility, or a credible exit path.

Robotics will take defined and repeatable physical tasks, eventually. Digital pre-production will become more useful, hopefully soon. Carbon accounting will enter more procurement conversations, for sure. But the most consequential shift will be contractual and behavioral: data rights, agent permissions, interoperability, consent, and the human authority to stop a bad decision before it reaches attendees.

That is the version of “who owns the room?” I want event leaders to prepare for now.

Your prediction on cognitive load also deserves its own conversation. We should design for the attendee’s capacity, certainly. We should also account for the capacity of the people producing the experience, carrying the invisible work between the work, and making decisions under pressure.

Thank you for putting a real point of view on here.

Aaron Bludworth's avatar

David, I've loved this series. A lot of very insightful thinking. I particularly like the bit about CVB's in this segment. And though I don't like the contractor "stranglehold" characterization - I'm hoping that is just a basket for the problem - as contractors are not taking wheelbarrows of money to the bank and did not alone create the cost shifting that partially leads to drayage being the one cost with a massive up lever. There is room for some degree of robotization of material handling, however it will not be theatrical lifts (that would drive drayage costs over the life of the equipment and maintenance to levels never seen before), there has to be major labor reforms (non-industry, national) before even the realistic robots can enter the scene. So since this one is in my wheelhouse, I needed to chime in. Robotic assist in material handling is possible and coming, possibly even within 10 years, lift from the floor will not be a thing in 50 years. Thanks again for this series and the amazing work that is going into it. AB

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?