The subscriber evidence layer behind this part’s predictions. Each brief carries the claim, the real-world signal with named sources, and an honest confidence rating.

Read more

Why we run this every month: the sharpest operators in this business are the ones who take in everything, not just their own lane but the whole field, because that is where the better ideas and the smarter strategy come from. The world the industry works in keeps getting smaller and more connected by the year. The Culture Drop is a finger on its pulse.

The gathering economy likes to imagine it is two industries. One is B2B: trade shows, conferences, corporate meetings, the business of selling to other businesses inside convention halls. The other is B2C: festivals, concerts, consumer spectacle, the business of selling wonder to the public. The people in each tend to believe they are in a different profession from the people in the other. August is the month that argues otherwise.

Look at what they share. The convention center that hosts a cybersecurity conference one week hosts a comic convention the next. The company that builds a festival main stage builds the keynote stage at a corporate summit. A total eclipse over Spain, about as consumer a spectacle as exists, becomes a repositioning problem for the cruise industry’s corporate planners. The crews, the venues, the freight, the labor, and the calendar are shared infrastructure, and when one side has a big month, the other feels it in hotel rates and truck rentals. The stadiums that hosted the World Cup final in July sit mostly empty now, waiting for football and the fall convention season, while the biggest crowds of August gather in places nobody built to last.

That is the first false divide the month dissolves. There is a second, between the permanent venues that carry the debt and the temporary cities that carry the crowds. Start with the temporary ones.

THE CITIES THAT VANISH BY SEPTEMBER

For a few weeks every August, some of the largest population centers on earth are places that did not exist in July and will not exist in September. Burning Man raises Black Rock City out of the Nevada playa on the 30th and holds roughly seventy thousand people through Labor Day before the whole thing is struck to nothing and hauled away, leaving a stretch of desert its own crews are contractually obligated to prove is empty. Sturgis, South Dakota, a town of about seven thousand, absorbs something close to half a million motorcyclists from the 7th through the 16th, most of them housed on private land by promoters who spend the other fifty weeks of the year selling the idea of those ten days. On an island in the Danube, Sziget builds a working festival city for four hundred thousand people between the 11th and the 15th and calls it, without irony, the Island of Freedom.

These are not events in the sense that a keynote is an event. They are municipalities with a shelf life. Someone has to lay the power, truck the water, place the sanitation, run the medical tents, and design the street grid, and then someone has to reverse all of it before the land reverts to whatever it was. The operators who do this work are not in the entertainment business. They are in the business of building and unbuilding cities on a deadline, and August is their peak.

Japan has been doing the same thing longer than anyone. In Aomori, the Nebuta Matsuri runs the 2nd through the 7th and pulls two to three million spectators to watch illuminated floats the size of buildings move through the streets, floats that a year-round guild of craftsmen builds specifically to be paraded once and retired. The economy of an entire northern city bends around a week of gathering. The float is not the product. The convening is.

The most authentic version of the temporary city is the one Americans have been building the longest. The state fairs return in August, and they are not nostalgia. The Iowa State Fair runs the 13th through the 23rd and draws more than a million people to Des Moines to judge livestock, sculpt butter, and eat things on sticks that were never meant to be on sticks. Wisconsin fills its fairgrounds the 6th through the 16th, and Minnesota’s Great Minnesota Get-Together, the biggest of them all by daily attendance, runs from late August into Labor Day. Underneath the spectacle is a working business event that predates the trade show by a century, a place where 4-H kids and seed dealers and equipment reps still do real agricultural commerce. The consumer fair and the industry fair are the same fair. They always were.

EDINBURGH, AND THE MONTH THAT DOES NOT STOP

If Black Rock City is the temporary city at its most extreme, Edinburgh is the temporary city at its most relentless. The Fringe runs the 7th through the 31st, more than three thousand shows across a few hundred venues, most of them rooms that are something else for the other eleven months. The International Festival, the curated high-culture anchor, overlaps it almost exactly and closes on the 30th. For most of August the entire city functions as a single distributed venue, and the people who make it work are the ones nobody photographs: the box-office managers, the accommodation brokers, the technical crews turning over a church hall four times a day.

The same discipline is running elsewhere on the continent. Salzburg holds its festival from the middle of July through the 30th of August and reorders a small Austrian city’s summer around opera. Birmingham hosts the European Athletics Championships from the 10th through the 16th, a stadium build plus a city-center fan zone, the now-standard architecture of a sporting gathering that wants the whole town involved. Glasgow closes its Commonwealth Games on the 2nd, and that one deserves a closer look than it will get, because Glasgow ran the Games without an athletes’ village, housing competitors in hotels and university residences and staging the first indoor opening ceremony. It is the cost-controlled mega-event as a working prototype, and every city that has ever balked at the price of hosting will be studying whether Glasgow’s version actually held.

London closes the month the way it always does, with Notting Hill Carnival on the 30th and 31st: one to two million people in the streets over a bank-holiday weekend, roughly three hundred food licenses, and a policing and road-closure operation that is less a festival than a controlled municipal event at enormous scale. Spain answers on the 26th with La Tomatina in Buñol, a town that has turned a single hour of throwing tomatoes into a ticketed, capacity-capped export product. Twenty thousand people, one hundred fifty tonnes of fruit, one morning. It is the purest demonstration in the calendar that a gathering does not need to last to be worth building.

LAS VEGAS: THE MACHINE THAT NEVER STRIKES THE SET

While the rest of the world builds cities that disappear, Las Vegas spends August being the opposite: the permanent gathering machine that simply changes its programming. The first week belongs to what the security industry calls Hacker Summer Camp. Black Hat takes Mandalay Bay from the 1st through the 6th, Ai4 fills the Venetian from the 4th through the 6th billing itself as the largest AI conference in the country, and DEF CON follows at the convention center from the 6th through the 9th. For a week the city’s hotel blocks, meeting halls, and show floors are running tens of thousands of engineers through a schedule that would collapse most destinations. Vegas does not build a temporary city for this. It already is one, and that is the entire proposition it sells.

The contrast is the point. Sturgis and Burning Man exist because their organizers conjure a place out of nothing and then erase it. Las Vegas exists because someone decided, permanently, that the gathering itself would be the municipal economy. Both models work. August is the month you can watch them run side by side.

THE GULF BUILDS INDOORS

Physical openings go quiet in August almost everywhere, and the calendar tells you why. The real ribbon-cuttings cluster in June and July and then again in September, and the deep summer is the trough between them. What August gets is soft launches and seasonal debuts, not grand openings: a Halloween haunt previewing at Universal Orlando on the 28th, an immersive Peaky Blinders attraction opening under the railway arches at London Bridge. The permanent side of the business spends the month loading for the fall. Los Angeles cuts the ribbon on George Lucas’s long-delayed Museum of Narrative Art on the 22nd of September, IHG opens its first all-inclusive Kimpton in the Riviera Maya the same day, and Buffalo plays the first game in its two-billion-dollar stadium on the 17th. August is the pause before all of that.

The exception is the Gulf, and the exception is instructive. In Saudi Arabia the outdoor months are unlivable, so the Kingdom is building the gathering indoors. On the 5th of August, the Public Investment Fund’s entertainment arm opens SEVEN Abha, the first completed piece of a fourteen-destination, multi-billion-dollar network of indoor entertainment complexes, and it opens not in Riyadh or Jeddah but in a secondary highland city. That choice is the strategy showing its hand: prove the manufactured-gathering model in a smaller market first, then scale it. Red Sea Global opened Six Senses Amaala in mid-July and continues doubling its resort count through the year. The Gulf’s version of the gathering economy is not organic and does not pretend to be. It is a sovereign wealth fund deciding, from the top down, where people will convene and building the rooms to make it happen.

THE GATHERING NO ONE CAN BUILD

On the 12th of August, for a little over two minutes, the moon’s shadow crosses the North Atlantic and makes landfall over Iceland and northern Spain, and it does the one thing no venue operator can promise: it draws an enormous crowd to an exact place at an exact second, guaranteed, on a schedule set by orbital mechanics rather than a booking calendar. It is the first total solar eclipse over mainland Europe since 2006, and the tourism boards have spent two years selling it. Spain is the prize. The path of totality runs west to east across the north of the country, through Bilbao, Zaragoza, Valencia, and Palma de Mallorca, and it arrives near sunset, which means a low horizon and a dramatic final act. Madrid and Barcelona sit just outside the line and get only a partial. In the gathering economy, a few kilometers is the difference between a sold-out city and an ordinary Wednesday.

The numbers read like a music festival stretched across two countries. Flight bookings to Spain and Iceland for the eclipse week are running about a quarter ahead of last year, hotel rates more than a third higher, and Bilbao’s hotel demand is up more than three hundred percent. An astronomer in Iceland told the press the country will simply be sold out on the day, inside the path of totality and outside it both. Nobody built a stadium for this. The venue is the sky, and the operators are the airlines, the hotels, and the tour companies scrambling to place bodies under two minutes of darkness.

The cruise lines saw it coming first. The real cruise story of August 2026 is not a christening but a repositioning: dozens of ships from Princess, Holland America, Celebrity, Royal Caribbean, Cunard, and the expedition specialists have timed their itineraries to intercept the shadow at sea, where the longest totality falls off Iceland’s west coast. Princess is selling dedicated eclipse voyages with astronomers aboard and glasses in the cabins, and the premium sailings are already posting waitlists. A cruise ship is the purest floating version of the temporary city this whole month is about, a self-contained population that assembles, sails to a coordinate, and disperses. Two genuine new ships debut into the same waters, Explora Journeys’ liquefied-gas-powered Explora III on its Barcelona-to-Lisbon maiden voyage on the 3rd, and Royal Caribbean’s Legend of the Seas, the third of its record-size Icon class and the first based in the Mediterranean rather than Miami. Spain gets to run the whole operation twice more, a total eclipse again in August 2027 and a ring-of-fire annular in January 2028, and the tourism ministry is already selling the trilogy.

THE OPERATORS’ OWN CALENDAR

The people who run everyone else’s gatherings get a narrow window in August to hold their own, and they use it. The Corporate Event Marketing Association (CEMA) takes its members, the people who produce the events for the world’s biggest brands, to Toronto from the 9th through the 11th for a summit that is equal parts classroom and dealmaking. The American Society of Association Executives brings six thousand association professionals and the suppliers who court them to Indianapolis from the 15th through the 18th, which is a fitting host city this year: Indianapolis is finishing an eight-hundred-room Signia by Hilton, connected by skywalk to its convention center, that finally closes the headquarters-hotel gap the city has argued about for a decade. The venue that will host conventions is itself the product of one. The show owners get their own turn the same week, when the Society of Independent Show Organizers convenes in Seattle from the 18th through the 20th: not the planners and not the association executives but the operators whose names are on the exhibitions, the people who own the floor. Connect Marketplace takes three thousand meeting planners and suppliers to Tampa from the 24th through the 26th to do the appointment-driven business that keeps the sector’s pipeline full. These are the quiet, consequential weeks before the industry’s marquee shows land in the fall, IMEX in Las Vegas in October and IBTM in Barcelona in November.

Not every August gathering is for sale. Freeman, the company that builds many of the show floors the rest of the industry rents, gathers three hundred of its leaders in Seattle from the 11th through the 13th for Camp Buck, its annual internal meeting on culture, named for the founder who started the company in 1927. It is the rare August gathering whose only product is a company’s own ethos, carried back out through the people who build everyone else’s rooms.

The single largest trade gathering of the month is not in the events industry at all. It is Gamescom, which fills the Koelnmesse in Cologne from the 26th through the 30th and drew three hundred fifty-seven thousand people last year, the biggest attendance figure on the August calendar by a wide margin. Toronto runs Fan Expo Canada the same weekend, north of a hundred thousand attendees, and Munich absorbs one of the world’s largest medical congresses when the European Society of Cardiology arrives from the 28th through the 31st with something close to thirty thousand delegates. The trade-show world does not vanish the way Black Rock City does. It just moves from hall to hall, city to city, month to month, and August is simply its turn in Cologne.

New York catches the handoff at the very end. The US Open opens its gates for Fan Week on the 23rd and runs its qualifying and its record million-plus crowd into September, the last great August-into-autumn gathering, a three-week hospitality operation staged on the same grounds every year. And in East Rutherford, the stadium that emptied out in July sits waiting for September, its bond schedule indifferent to whether anything is happening inside it tonight.

That is what the month exposes. The industry sorts itself into tidy opposites, B2B and B2C, permanent and temporary, the people who sell to businesses and the people who sell to the public, and August respects none of it. The hacker conference and the music festival hire the same rigger. The eclipse that pulls consumers to a Spanish hilltop is a sales quarter for a cruise line. The permanent venues carry the debt and spend the month mostly empty; the temporary cities carry the crowds and vanish. Somewhere in the overlap is the operator who stopped believing the categories and learned to work all of them. By September the playa is swept clean, the Fringe venues are churches again, and the tomatoes have been hosed off the streets of Buñol. The people who made those places will already be pricing out next year.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news.

A note before the predictions. This is my take — a point of view, not a forecast I’m betting the house on. Some of it will be wrong; I’ve misjudged this industry’s timing in every decade I’ve worked in it, and I’ll misjudge some of this too. The point isn’t to be right. It’s to pull the camera back far enough to see the whole board, and to think it through together. So read what follows as an invitation, not a verdict — and tell me where I’m off. That’s the whole idea.

The intelligence layer is not the events industry’s friend. It is the mechanism by which the events industry’s self-reported claims about its own value will, for the first time, face external scrutiny from systems that cannot be charmed, lobbied, or taken to dinner. The organizer who has been surviving on the absence of rigorous evaluation is about to meet the evaluation she was never designed to pass.

AI Agents Become the Most Important Audience the Organizer Has Never Designed For.

The agent operating on behalf of a company’s professional development budget does not read speaker bios and feel inspired. It reads last year’s attendee list and cross-references it against the company’s target accounts. It calculates the fully loaded cost of sending two people, including flights, hotel, registration, and three days of lost productivity at the fully-burdened salary rate, and compares that number against alternative uses of the same budget. It checks whether the key relationships the sales team needs to build are confirmed attendees before committing the registration fee. It does all of this in seconds, without the cognitive bias that makes a human book a conference because she went last year and it was fine, or because the hotel is nice, or because the city is one she has been meaning to visit.

Vendelux already uses AI to score events against company-specific criteria and identify which target accounts will be present, and it is used by enterprise sales and marketing teams to evaluate conference attendance decisions. The organizer whose value proposition does not survive that evaluation is already in trouble. She just does not know it yet because the evaluation is still being done by humans who are susceptible to the persuasion mechanisms she has always relied on.

The Neutral Scoreboard Arrives.

The events industry is the last major experience category operating without an independent measurement standard. Nielsen measures television audiences with methodology that neither the network nor the advertiser controls. Comscore measures box office with numbers that the studio cannot adjust after a disappointing opening weekend. The conference has the organizer’s self-reported attendance figure, which is unaudited and defined however the organizer finds convenient, and a post-event satisfaction survey that the organizer designed, administered, and reports at whatever level of aggregation she finds flattering.

The neutral scoreboard arrives because the AI agent makes it inevitable: the agent needs third-party-verified outcome data to make attendance recommendations, and it will route corporate spending toward the events that can provide it and away from events that cannot. Explori provides post-event research and benchmarking across a network of events, which is the closest existing example of cross-event measurement infrastructure, though it is not neutral in the full sense because it is funded by organizers rather than buyers. The organization that builds the genuinely neutral version will not come from inside the industry, whose revenue depends on organizers, but from the corporate buyer side, whose interest is accurate information.

Event Data Becomes Intellectual Property.

The behavioral data generated by a 10,000-person trade show is an extraordinarily rich asset: who talked to whom on the floor, which booths sustained dwell time versus which generated a scan and an immediate exit, which sessions emptied at the seven-minute mark, which content formats correlated with return attendance the following year. Most organizers currently generate this data and do nothing with it beyond the post-show attendee survey. The platform that aggregates event behavioral data across multiple organizers will have something worth considerably more than the events that generated it, which means the organizer who understands this now and begins treating her data as a strategic asset has a compounding advantage over the organizer who sells her data to the aggregating platform and loses the compounding advantage forever.

Real-Time Translation Becomes Invisible Infrastructure.

AI-powered simultaneous translation, delivered through the attendee’s phone without hardware, operating with sub-second latency in 40 languages, eliminates language as a meaningful barrier to international attendance for any conference that publishes its content digitally. The technology trajectory is clear: Google’s real-time translation operates at conversational speed in over 100 languages, and Kudo, designed specifically for conference interpretation, has deployed AI-assisted interpretation across major international events. The United Nations has deployed AI-assisted interpretation tools across multiple official meetings, with human interpreters reviewing AI output rather than working from scratch, which is the hybrid model that professional conferences will adopt before moving to full AI translation. The event becomes genuinely global at the same moment its physical footprint becomes more locally concentrated.

Community Platforms Become Event Organizers.

The Slack communities, Discord servers, and private networks built around professional identities that have accumulated real audiences over the past decade are reaching a structural inflection point. They have the attendees, the content relationships, and the year-round engagement data that tells them exactly what their members want to talk about. Lenny Rachitsky, whose Substack on product management has over one million subscribers, has organized sold-out in-person events that compete directly with traditional product management conferences. The organizer who built the audience through the event format is now the challenger. The structural advantage belongs to the platform that built the audience and is adding the event, because the platform does not need to spend 30 to 40 percent of event revenue on marketing to find the people who already trust it. Another term that is used will be “Eventfluencers”, the influencers who really become more sophisticated and will see the obvious event connectivity among communities of interest.

The Evidence Briefs for this story is for paid subscribers. To join our paid community click on the story.

The Complete Series

The subscriber evidence layer behind this part’s predictions. Each brief carries the claim, the real-world signal with named sources, and an honest confidence rating.

How to use: The destination behind this part’s single evidence link. In the draft, delete the per-prediction “Full evidence brief…” placeholders in the Intelligence Layer section and replac…

Read more

Subscribe now

A note before the predictions. This is my take — a point of view, not a forecast I’m betting the house on. Some of it will be wrong; I’ve misjudged this industry’s timing in every decade I’ve worked in it, and I’ll misjudge some of this too. The point isn’t to be right. It’s to pull the camera back far enough to see the whole board, and to think it through together. So read what follows as an invitation, not a verdict — and tell me where I’m off. That’s the whole idea. Full evidence brief, named sources, and confidence rating for subscribers.

Leonardo da Vinci did not stage court entertainments. He staged arguments about power, beauty, and what human ingenuity could make possible, using light and music and machinery as his vocabulary. The distinction he drew between a spectacle that impresses and an experience that awakens is the distinction the events industry has been collapsing for 40 years. The next decade is the decade that distinction costs people money.

The Goosebump Effect Becomes the Industry’s Only Defensible Product.

There is a moment every serious event organizer knows and almost none can reliably produce. The energy in the room changes before anyone can explain why. The audience leans forward together. The speaker who was performing starts telling the truth. The hair on the back of the neck rises. This is the goosebump effect, and it is the only thing the gathering economy makes that nothing else can make. Not a podcast, not a webinar, not a virtual event with 10,000 attendees and a chat window moving faster than anyone can read.

It requires a critical mass of people paying attention to the same thing at the same moment, who can feel each other feeling it, whose collective recognition amplifies the individual experience into something that would not exist if any one of them were missing. Uri Hasson’s research at Princeton on neural coupling demonstrates measurably different brain responses in live versus recorded storytelling contexts. In a world where every content format is being democratized and every information advantage is being eroded, the goosebump effect is the events industry’s only genuinely defensible product. The industry’s failure to develop a rigorous account of how to produce it is the most significant intellectual gap in a field that has spent enormous energy on production logistics and almost none on the phenomenology of its own core product. The other thing to note is that the goosebump effect is also that great conversation in the hallway, on the bus, at the reception. You know it when you know it and can be life changing.

An Experience Is Not a Spectacle.

Leonardo da Vinci built a mechanical lion that walked across a floor and opened its chest to release lilies. It was not entertainment. It was a message about power, beauty, and what human ingenuity could make possible. The events industry builds spectacles and calls them experiences, and the distinction between those two things is about to cost the industry money in a way it previously has not. A spectacle is something you watch. An experience is something that changes the state you are in, that you carry out of the room as something you did not bring in.

By 2036 the AI agent evaluating attendance on documented outcomes and the neutral scoreboard measuring whether attendees left changed rather than merely impressed will make the distinction visible in commercial terms for the first time. The organizer who has been producing well-reviewed spectacles and calling them transformative experiences will find the evaluation uncomfortable.

The Event Forge Becomes Standard Infrastructure.

Rock Lititz is a campus in Lititz, Pennsylvania, where Beyoncé, Taylor Swift, and U2 rehearse their world tours. Thousands of professionals work in coordinated collision before a single audience member is in the room. The emotional arc is engineered. The pacing is adjusted. The spotlight is moved by half a second. Nothing meets for the first time at the venue. Brooklyn rave producers and sensory architects who cut their teeth in warehouse parties now test show flow in the same rehearsal spaces as world tours, because they have figured out what the corporate events world has not: if you want people to remember a moment, you design it twice. Once in private. Once for the world.

A second Forge is opening in Nashville. The counterargument is that the model requires capital and production scale that the average conference organizer does not have. That is currently true and it is also a market gap rather than a permanent condition. The shared rehearsal facility available to corporate event producers on a day-rate basis does not yet exist for the conference market. The first company that builds it will have built the infrastructure the next generation of serious event organizers needs.

Facilitation Becomes the Most Valuable Skill in the Room.

For 40 years the events industry treated facilitation as something you hired a consultant to do at an offsite when the agenda required breakouts. As the general session loses its authority, as attendees arrive having already consumed the ideas, as corporate clients demand that their people leave having changed something rather than witnessed something, the capacity to design and run a genuine conversation becomes the differentiating skill in the market. The supply of skilled facilitators is growing through the Art of Hosting movement, the International Association of Facilitators, and the documented success of participant-driven conference formats pioneered by Adrian Segar’s Conferences That Work model since 2009. I have been experimenting with a list of formats in my new site called Gatheringarchitecture.com By 2036 facilitation is as foundational to the professional conference organizer as budget management and vendor negotiation. The irony is that the skill is ancient. The industry just forgot it had a name.

Serendipity Engineering Replaces Serendipity Hope.

Every conference director says they want serendipity. Almost none have a methodology for producing it. What they have is a cocktail reception and a hope. The research coming out of MIT’s Human Dynamics Lab, specifically Alex Pentland’s work on social physics published in 2014, demonstrates that serendipity is not random. Certain environmental and social conditions produce unexpected high-value connections at rates meaningfully higher than chance, and those conditions can be engineered. Many matching platforms including Grip, The Braindate platform, used at C2 Montreal and other conferences, allows attendees to post topics and find others interested in the same conversation, producing structured serendipity that feels like genuine discovery because the attendee initiates the connection on her own terms. It’s interesting to note that C2MTL is actually taking a year off to reinvent itself that could be a sign of strength for major events.

New Arrival Architecture Multiplies the Serendipitous Encounter.

The convention centers and hotels that processes everyone through one set of doors is not designing for experience. It is designing for throughput. The architectural shift toward multiple smaller entry points, each routing a different tribe through a different path, produces more unexpected encounters in the first ten minutes than a two-hour cocktail reception, because the collision happens at the moment of arrival when the attendee’s attention is at its freshest rather than at the end of a day when it is at its most depleted. The entry architecture that is clear enough to navigate without decision points while still creating the conditions for unexpected encounter is harder to design than either the single-door or the multiple-door version, which is why it does not yet exist as a named convention center design standard.

Subscribe now

The General Session Is Discontinued as the Default Format.

The ballroom-with-a-screen is the industry’s version of the open-plan office: a design solution to a problem that no longer exists, perpetuated by sunk-cost commitment to infrastructure and a professional class that never questioned its own defaults. The problem it solved was information scarcity. Information is not scarce. The format is not justified. TED maintains the general session format but redesigns it around strict time limits, high production values, and speaker coaching that makes the passive experience exceptional rather than routine. The format survives when the quality bar is high enough to justify it. The quality bar in most conference general sessions is not high enough to justify it, and the organizer who treats the general session as a default rather than a design choice is making the most expensive and least examined decision in her program.

The Keynote Market Bifurcates and the Organizer Who Cannot Tell the Difference Overpays

A $250,000 keynote speaker generates approximately 45 minutes of attention from 3,000 people. The math has always been difficult to defend on pure content economics, and the industry has defended it anyway for a reason that is both accurate and rarely stated plainly: the keynote is not primarily a content delivery mechanism. It is a social transaction that serves everyone in the room simultaneously. The organizer gets a signal of status that fills the room. The attendee gets bragging rights that justify the trip to her boss. The speaker gets a platform and a fee that reflects the fact that she is not selling content. She is selling the social fact of her presence, and that fact is genuinely scarce in a way that the content is not. The speakers who can generate genuine bragging rights will find their fees rising because scarcity is increasing, not decreasing, as the recorded version becomes universally available. The speakers who are priced as bragging-rights generators but are actually content deliverers will find their market shrinking as the AI agent calculates the fully loaded cost and the attendee realizes she watched the same talk on YouTube last month.

The Awards Dinner Loses Its Last Institutional Anchor.

The mechanism is not the award. The mechanism is the honoree. The organization running the dinner identifies a senior executive whose professional network is deep enough that her vendors and suppliers and agency partners will feel the social and commercial weight of being seen in the room when she is being celebrated publicly. The vendor who did not show up to honor the person who controls the contracts has made a statement, and everyone understands what the statement means. This works. It has always worked. The table revenue proves it works. But the room that empties by thirty percent before the final award has been presented is a room that has already communicated something to the remaining honorees about what their recognition is worth. The format does not die because the mechanism stops working. It loses its institutional anchor because the room no longer holds, and a room that cannot hold is a room that can no longer do the one thing the format requires.

The Question of Relevance Becomes Existential.

Content delivery, product exposure, and speaker access are all available on demand. The trade show floor that was where you saw the new product before it was available anywhere else now competes with the product’s website, its YouTube launch event, its LinkedIn announcement. Comdex was the largest technology trade show in the world in the 1990s. It closed in 2003. The lesson it left was not that trade shows were finished. It was that the trade show which could not answer what the room made possible that the website did not was already finished, whether it knew it or not. The room survives when the organizer can answer the question. When she cannot, the room empties a little earlier each year, for reasons she attributes to everything except the right one.

Full evidence brief, named sources, and confidence rating for subscribers.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe atGatheringPoint.news.

The subscriber evidence layer behind this part’s predictions. Each brief carries the claim, the real-world signal with named sources, and an honest confidence rating.

Read more

A note before the predictions. This is my take — a point of view, not a forecast I'm betting the house on. Some of it will be wrong; I've misjudged this industry's timing in every decade I've worked in it, and I'll misjudge some of this too. The point isn't to be right. It's to pull the camera back far enough to see the whole board, and to think it through together. So read what follows as an invitation, not a verdict — and tell me where I'm off. That's the whole idea. For full evidence briefs for paid subscribers go click here:

What’s ahead — six territories, forty-four predictions:

1. (TODAY) The Attendee — the badge doesn’t die; it migrates to your glasses, and the stranger knows your name before you say hello.-

2. The Experience — the goosebump effect is the only thing you make that nothing else can. Most rooms can’t produce it.

3. The Intelligence Layer — the most important attendee you’ve never designed for is the AI agent deciding whether your people come.

4. Pricing & Contracting — the event contract hasn’t changed since 1982. That ends now.

5. Who Owns the Room — your counterpart across the table is becoming a yield algorithm run by a national platform.

6. The Belonging Economy — the conference is the most sophisticated belonging machine we’ve built. That’s the whole business.

Missed the prequel? Start with Fifty Years in the Room — fifty years back, before ten years forward. Get a paid subscription today to get the entire picture. gatheringpoint.news/subscribe

Here we go: The attendee of 2036 is not more demanding than the attendee of 2025. She is more capable of comparison, more protected from manipulation by the agent evaluating her attendance decisions, and more conscious of what her time and attention are worth. The event that treats her as a body to be processed through a registration queue and directed toward a content delivery system will not see her again. The event that treats her as the reason the room exists is the event that has earned what comes next.

The Badge Does Not Die. It Migrates.

Biometric entry technology already processes attendees faster and more securely than any badge system, and the adoption curve in sports venues is steep enough to reach conference and trade show infrastructure within the decade. By 2025, 35 percent of major stadiums were using biometric entry, and when the LA Clippers opened the Intuit Dome in 2024, the projected one-in-three fan opt-in to Game Face ID reached 75 percent by the end of the first season, more than double expectations.

But the badge was never only a credential. It was the events industry’s primary tool for making strangers legible to each other in a room: the permission structure that allowed the introvert to approach, the conversation starter that required no social courage, the mutual disclosure system that told everyone in the room who everyone else was. When the lanyard disappears, that function needs to go somewhere or the serendipity architecture of the event loses its most basic scaffolding.

Smart glasses are where it goes. Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses sold more than seven million units in 2025, and the company’s internally developed Name Tag feature, which overlays identity and profile information on the wearer’s field of vision when she looks at another person, is in active development. The IDC projects the smart glasses market growing from $1.5 billion in 2025 to $10 billion by 2030. The privacy counterargument is serious: the badge was a mutual disclosure system where everyone could see everyone else’s information simultaneously, while the smart glasses system is unilateral. That asymmetry resolves through the consent framework built into event registration. The organizer who builds this system is not eliminating the badge. She is building the badge that Leonardo would have built if he had known what was coming.

The Attendee Journey Is Redesigned From the Outside In.

The current attendee journey is designed around the organizer’s operational milestones: registration opens, agenda posts, hotel block closes, app downloads, doors open. None of these milestones are designed around the attendee’s cognitive or emotional preparation for the event. The redesign happens when organizers stop asking what they need to run the event and start asking what the attendee needs in order to change something when she returns to her office.

That is a different design brief. It starts eight weeks before the event with curated content that prepares the attendee to use her time on-site rather than orient herself on-site, builds personal agendas around who she is trying to meet rather than what sessions are available, and creates re-entry moments 90 days after the event that let her apply what she encountered rather than lose it to the flight home. C2 Montreal has built its attendee journey as an experience arc that begins weeks before the event and extends after it, with structured follow-through built into the program. Their renewal rates are among the highest in the conference market.

Attendee Discovery Becomes the Industry’s Most Urgent Unsolved Problem.

The events industry is the only major attention economy without a neutral discovery layer between the seller’s marketing and the buyer’s decision. Every other category has independent rating and recommendation infrastructure: Rotten Tomatoes for films, Yelp for restaurants, TripAdvisor for hotels. Conferences have the organizer’s early-bird email and whatever a colleague mentioned in a hallway. The companies that build a neutral discovery layer will restructure power in the market as completely as Yelp restructured restaurants, because the organizer who has been surviving on captive audience loyalty and the absence of a better comparison mechanism loses that protection the moment the comparison becomes possible.

Luma, the events platform, is the closest existing example of a discovery layer for the technology conference market, aggregating events and enabling social proof through RSVPs, but it remains organizer-driven rather than neutral. The neutral version has not been built. The market is waiting for it.

Low Cognitive Load Becomes the Organizing Design Principle, Not a Luxury.

The average professional attending a major conference makes approximately 200 discrete decisions over three days. Each decision withdraws from the cognitive budget she brought to the event. By the time she reaches the first session she intended to attend, she has already spent resources that should have been available for the content, the connection, and the conversation. Low cognitive load is not a comfort argument. It is the baseline condition under which an experience, as opposed to a spectacle, can occur at all. XOXO festival in Portland, deliberately small, single track, invitation-only, no concurrent sessions, has been consistently cited as one of the most valuable professional experiences in the technology and creative community despite offering a fraction of the session count of comparable conferences. That is not a coincidence. That is a design philosophy.

Joy Becomes a Measured Outcome.

The events industry measures attendance, session utilization, and net promoter scores. It does not measure whether anything happened to the person who showed up. Joy is not a soft metric. It is the primary output of the gathering economy, and the industry that cannot measure its primary output is not a mature industry. The experience sampling methodology developed by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, pinging participants at intervals and asking them to rate their current emotional state on a validated affect scale, produces reliable data without requiring continuous engagement from the participant. The organizer who calls 50 attendees at 30, 90, and 180 days after the event and asks three specific questions about what changed is building the measurement infrastructure that no competitor currently has and that the AI agent will eventually require before routing attendance recommendations.

Neurodiversity Becomes Baseline Design.

Corporate clients are beginning to hold events to the same accessibility and inclusion standards they apply to workplace design. The event designer who cannot spec a sensory-safe environment is behind in the same way the architect who could not spec wheelchair accessibility was behind in 1995. The Orange County Convention Center has pursued sensory-inclusive certification, adding quiet rooms, sensory kits at guest services, and trained staff. The corporate client with a neurodiversity inclusion mandate in its HR policy is already writing RFPs that include sensory accommodation specifications, and the venue that cannot answer those specifications loses the booking to the venue that can. The baseline shifts when the buyer requires it. The buyer is starting to require it.

Tribal Personalization Replaces Demographic Segmentation.

Demographic segmentation tells you who someone is on paper. Tribal personalization tells you who someone is in relation to the thing they care about. Nicole Peck, Executive Vice President at Clarion Events, designed an entrance for an event where attendees chose at registration whether they were salt people or sugar people. Two entrances. Two completely different arrival experiences. Two self-identified tribes that immediately had something genuine to talk about with every stranger they encountered, because the choice had told them something true about themselves before the first handshake. The tribes are not the destination. They are the entry point to cross-tribal encounter. The event that uses tribal identity to route people toward each other, rather than to sort people into separate experiences that never intersect, is the event that has understood what Nicole Peck built and why it worked.

Full evidence brief, named sources, and confidence rating for subscribers.

Next: The Experience. The goosebump effect, the Event Forge, facilitation, serendipity engineering, and the predictions that will generate the most argument in the industry.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news.

The Complete Series:

The subscriber evidence layer behind Predictions 1–7. Each brief carries the claim, the real-world signal with named sources, and an honest confidence rating.

How to use: each brief is the destination behind the “Full evidence brief, named sources, and confidence rating for subscribers” line on its prediction card. Drop one beneath each prediction below …

Read more

I came to the events industry through the back door of Washington society journalism. A month after I graduated from American University I launched Washington Dossier, a magazine that covered the soft power of the nation’s capital: the dinners, the embassy receptions, the charity galas, the private gatherings where the real decisions got made in rooms the official record never mentioned. I thought I was covering politics. I was covering events. The people moving the city were not the ones with the titles. They were the ones organizing the gatherings.

I ran Washington Dossier for fifteen years and sold it. I spent a few years in corporate communications at Macmillan and Primedia, where the CEOs who understood events used them to do what advertising could not: change how people felt about a company by putting them in a room together. They understood soft power before it had a name. Then, from 1991 to 1994, I was at Cone Communications doing what I called passion branding, using events as cause drivers. The Avon Breast Cancer Initiative. The Reebok Human Rights Awards. The gathering as the mechanism that connected a brand to a value the audience already held, in a room where the connection became real rather than merely stated.

By 2000 I understood what twenty-five years had been teaching me. The events industry was not a service sector. It was a power sector. And it deserved to be covered as one. That was the founding argument of BizBash.

What follows in this story is a prelude to 44 very rough predictions of what the world could be in 2036, fifty years of watching that argument tested by every disruption the industry absorbed, organized in the decade chunks that make the testing visible. Because the most important thing I can tell you about the next ten years is what the previous five decades taught me about how wrong everyone was, every decade, about what was coming. And how much faster wrong arrived each time.

Three men who argued the industry into being

The industry I walked into in 1975 already rested on three arguments, even if most people working in it could not have named one.

Jack Morton made the first in 1939, when he founded his production company in Washington and started booking Bob Hope and George Burns for corporate conventions, not to entertain the audience but to carry the company’s message through the entertainment.

He invented what he called corporate theater: the idea that a business gathering could be produced with the same intention as a play, that an executive’s message could be embedded in a show that made people feel something rather than simply receive information. When the show began, Jack Morton watched the audience, not the act. That was a new idea in 1939. It is still a new idea in most conference rooms in the world, which tells you how slowly the fundamental insights of this industry travel even when the tools change every decade.

Buck Freeman made the second argument earlier still. In 1927 he opened the first Freeman Decorating Company office in Des Moines, after discovering as a fraternity pledge that he had a gift for making the space of a gathering feel like something rather than merely look like something. Morton went on to invent the designed experience. Freeman went on to build the operational infrastructure that made the designed experience physically possible at scale. One was the creative argument. The other was the physical reality. The American events industry needed both, and got both from men who started by decorating and booking parties and never stopped believing that what happened in a room was worth taking seriously.

Earl Hargrove Sr. made the third argument from the same city I grew up in. He and his son founded their company in the suburbs of Washington at the end of the war and began producing events for the federal government, the associations, and eventually the most consequential recurring gathering in American civic life: the presidential inauguration. Hargrove has been involved in every inauguration since Truman took the oath in 1949. Nineteen consecutive transfers of American presidential power passed through the operational hands of one Washington family business. Earl Hargrove Jr. drove the parade float himself until he was nearly eighty. When someone asked why he kept going despite an arthritic limp, he said it would kill him not to go. That is not a contractor speaking. That is someone who understood from the beginning that the gathering he built was the moment a democracy makes itself visible to itself.

Morton built the corporate argument. Freeman built the operational argument. Hargrove built the civic argument. Between them, working in the same decades from the same American cities, they covered the full spectrum of what the gathering economy is actually for. I started in 1975 inheriting all three traditions without quite knowing it.

1975 to 1985: The room is everything

In 1975 producing an event invitation required two tools and a steady hand. The body text went to a typesetter who returned galleys two days later that you cut and pasted onto a layout board with rubber cement. The display type, the name of the event, the date in large letterforms, came from a box of Letraset.

Letraset was dry-transfer lettering that raised the design sense of a poster, an invitation and a newsletter. Each sheet was a page of pre-printed letters in a single typeface and size. You laid the sheet over your board, positioned the letter you wanted, and rubbed a pencil across the back of it. The letter transferred to the page. One letter at a time. You built the headline character by character, spacing by eye, praying you did not run out of the letter e before the title was finished. It was not glamorous. But it let an event producer make something look designed without sending every job to a studio, and in an era when the invitation communicated the quality of the event, that mattered.

The registration list lived in a three-ring binder, updated in pen when someone cancelled. The seating chart lived on graph paper, the eraser marks still visible under the new names. Everything was slow and everything was deliberate, and the deliberateness was not a burden. It was a discipline the tools enforced, and I did not know I would miss it until the tools stopped enforcing it.

The room was the only place the event existed. There was no recording, no livestream, no pre-event content package. You came to the room or you did not know what happened there. That was not a limitation. It was the whole point. The gathering was not one channel among many. It was the only channel, which meant everyone who built one understood, without being told, that the room was the product. Nothing else was available to dilute that clarity.

Then the IBM Selectric gave us the correction tape. You pressed a key and the mistake lifted off the page as if it had never happened. For the first time in the history of typing, an error had no consequence, and the discipline that the difficulty of correction had enforced began, almost imperceptibly, to relax. Every tool that reduces friction also reduces the discipline the friction was enforcing. The question this industry has never answered clearly enough is what to do with the attention the friction was protecting.

In 1975 nobody predicted that the hotel would spend the next decade turning the conference relationship into a financial instrument. The attrition clause did not exist. The food-and-beverage minimum did not exist. The contract every planner now signs and argues over for three weeks was not yet standard practice. A decade is long enough to invent an entirely new power structure and make it feel like it was always there.

1985 to 1995: The hotel takes over

The room block arrived as standard practice, and the attrition clause arrived with it: the penalty for not filling the rooms you had promised to fill, priced against revenue the hotel projected rather than revenue it lost. The food-and-beverage minimum arrived alongside both, bundled into a contract written by the hotel’s lawyer and reviewed by nobody on the planner’s side who understood what she was signing. These were not policies built around the planner’s interest or the attendee’s experience. They were financial instruments built around the hotel’s need to convert the conference business from a relationship into a guarantee. The industry accepted them because the hotels had the rooms, and nobody had yet built the data that would make the hotel’s projections challengeable.

The fax machine arrived and felt like a miracle, a document that traveled faster than a person. The conference call arrived and convinced everyone for about three years that the meeting was finished. The meeting was not finished. The conference call revealed, by failing to replace it, that the meeting was doing something the call could not do. We did not have a name for that something. We would not have one until 2020, when it was taken away entirely and the name became obvious to everyone who had spent decades unable to say it.

The ATM arrived in this decade too, and its lesson is the one I have carried the longest. Before the ATM, cash for an event required forethought: a bank visit before three on a weekday, a careful count of the petty cash float, a real problem if the band needed paying and the cash ran out at nine on a Saturday. The ATM solved that. It also did something else. The bank teller who had spent her day counting out twenties was freed to do what the machine could not: notice the customer whose deposit patterns had changed, make the judgment that required knowing a person rather than processing a transaction. Her job did not disappear when the ATM arrived. It clarified. The machine handled the cash. The human handled everything the cash transaction had been obscuring.

I have thought about the ATM many times in the fifty years since, because it is the cleanest demonstration of what happens when a tool removes a friction from a human profession. The friction always turns out to have been concealing something, and what it conceals is usually the thing that matters most. The Letraset concealed the discipline of composition. The correction tape concealed the cost of carelessness. The ATM concealed the value of the human relationship in banking. The event app, when it arrived thirty years later, would conceal for a decade the fact that the event had always been the relationship and never the information. Every tool clarifies by removing what it replaces. The question is always what you do with the clarity once you have it.

The industry was also building its professional identity in this decade, and one moment stands for the rest. In 1987 Joe Goldblatt and a small group of practitioners each pledged two hundred dollars to start what became the International Special Events Society. Goldblatt went on to create the field’s first credential, build the first master’s program in event management at George Washington University, the same campus where Jack Morton had booked fraternity dances fifty years earlier, and argue, before anyone else would, that event management was not just a profession worth practicing but a discipline worth studying. That was the argument the whole industry had been waiting for permission to make.

In 1985 nobody predicted the internet. Not in any form that would have read as a threat to the trade show floor. A decade is long enough for the primary justification of your business model to disappear without warning.

1995 to 2005: The internet arrives, and I build the record

The trade show floor was supposed to die. It did not quite die, but it was never the same. The shows that survived understood they had never been selling product visibility. They were selling the density of the right people in the same room at the same time, which the website could not replicate at any price. Comdex was the largest technology trade show in the world in the 1990s. It closed in 2003. The lesson it left was not that trade shows were finished. It was that the show which could not answer what the room made possible that the website did not was already finished, whether it knew it or not.

Then came September 11, 2001, and the gathering economy absorbed a disruption none of the others had produced: the discovery that a room full of people was not only a commercial proposition but a security one. Attendance and bookings collapsed through 2002 and into 2003. The longer effect was structural. Security became a line item. Credentialing became serious. The relationship between the organizer and local law enforcement became a professional requirement rather than an occasional courtesy. The work I did with Richard Aaron in those months, gathering the leaders of the industry at Gracie Mansion and asking them to return to New York, was partly about revenue and partly about something harder to name. It was about demonstrating that the gathering was still possible, that the room could still be built and filled and the people inside it kept safe. The answer to the disruption of the gathering was not the end of gathering. It was the gathering itself, done with more seriousness than before. A Broadway singer performed New York, New York in a room full of people who build gatherings for a living. I have never forgotten that room. I do not think anyone in it has.

I founded BizBash in 2000 with Richard Aaron, who became its president and brought what I could not provide alone: twenty years of production experience on the inside of the industry’s most sophisticated events. What we were trying to build, though I would not have said it this way at the time, was the first neutral scoreboard the industry had ever had. The trade press of the era was funded by the advertisers it covered, which produced coverage that announced things rather than evaluated them. BizBash covered the events industry the way a serious publication covers a serious subject, with standards accountable to the reader rather than the advertiser.

The person who made that real was Chad Kaydo, our editor in chief, who stayed for more than a decade. Chad came from journalism, not from events, and he brought the same standard he would have brought to fashion or politics. He treated the industry as a subject to be covered, not a vertical to be served, and he built the lists that made excellence legible for the first time: the Top 50 event designers, the Top 500 people in events. For the first time a third party with standards was saying, out loud, this is what good looks like. We also celebritized the vendor. The florist and the event designer had been anonymous service providers behind the client’s name. We named them as the creative intelligence they were, the way fashion magazines named designers. Instagram did the same thing on steroids fifteen years later, except the BizBash profile was an editorial judgment and the Instagram following is an audience metric with no accountability attached. That difference is one of the things the 2036 predictions are built to address.

The infrastructure caught up fast. Cvent, founded by Reggie Aggarwal arrived in 1999 and made the enterprise event manageable. Eventbrite founded by Jula and Kevin Hartz arrived in 2006 and made the small event possible, dropping the barrier to running an event to zero. Corbin Ball spent twenty-seven years standing in the gap between the engineers who wrote the software and the planners who still thought a spreadsheet answered every registration problem, translating the tools until the industry could use them. And the event stack began to multiply faster than any of them planned for, accumulating tools the way a conference accumulates sessions, on the theory that more was better, until the integration problem was bigger than any of the problems the tools had been built to solve.

In 1995 nobody predicted that a social network would restructure the economics of professional visibility, or that a registration company founded in a one-bedroom apartment would be worth billions. A decade is long enough for the infrastructure of an industry to be rebuilt by people who did not come from it.

2005 to 2015: Marketing discovers the room

The most important thing that happened to the room in this decade did not happen in a room. In January 2007 Steve Jobs walked onto a stage in San Francisco and introduced the iPhone, and within three years the thing he was holding sat in the pocket of nearly every person who would ever walk into one of these rooms. This was the disruption that made all the others in the decade possible. The internet had arrived in the 1990s and made information free. The iPhone made it ambient, carried, always on, alive in the attendee’s hand during every keynote she had paid to attend. The room had spent fifty years assuming it owned the attention of the people inside it. After 2007 it did not, and it would spend the rest of the decade competing, in every session, with the most refined attention-capture device ever built, held by the very people it was trying to reach. Everything else here, the money and the social network and the content strategy and the event app, presupposes that glass rectangle in the pocket.

It also changed the arithmetic of what a room was worth. You were no longer speaking only to the three hundred people in front of you. Through every phone held up in the room you were speaking to each of the hundreds of people those three hundred could reach, which meant you were producing the event for the friends of the people in the room as much as for the people in it. A gathering of three hundred became a broadcast to a hundred thousand, and the budget exploded to match the size of the real audience.

The money came from a different change: software sold by subscription. Before it, an enterprise software company had no ongoing relationship with its customers between purchase and renewal, and no reason to gather them. Subscription software created that community. When a hundred and fifty thousand companies all run the same living product at the same moment, the annual customer conference stops being a marketing event and becomes the physical manifestation of a subscription relationship. Dreamforce is not a trade show. It is the annual gathering of a community that exists in the product every other day of the year.

The economics moved the budget. When the marketing chief argues for Dreamforce, she is not asking for a discretionary event expense. She is asking to renew an investment measured in whether customers expand or contract their use of the product, and a conference that moves that number two points across a customer base that size is worth more than almost any other marketing dollar available. That argument pulled the event budget out of the communications department, handed it to marketing, and grew it by a factor nobody in the traditional meetings industry had anticipated, because nobody there had been tracking the metric that justified it.

A new kind of person controlled that budget. She had grown up on Facebook, understood that attention had moved, and walked into the room with a deck showing that the event was not just a gathering but a content production opportunity, that a room full of people with smartphones was a distribution network. She brought real insight about scarcity and social currency, about the invitation-only experience you could not buy your way into. She understood the brand had to be felt, not just seen, that the lighting and the furniture and the smell of the space were brand decisions. Jack Morton knew all of this in 1950. She rediscovered it in 2010, called it experiential, and charged accordingly.

She was not the first, and the branded environment she was rediscovering had a lineage older than any of it. George P. Johnson started as a Detroit flag and sail shop in 1914, drifted into dressing the Detroit Auto Show in the 1920s, and spent the next century turning the corporate pavilion into an art form: the spinning turntable under the new car in 1961, the Chrysler pavilion at the 1964 World’s Fair, and eventually the production behind Dreamforce itself, the software conference this decade turned into a revenue engine. When the marketing chief called the room experiential in 2010, George P. Johnson had been building experiential since before Jack Morton booked his first band. The agency that produces the industry’s largest software gathering did not discover experiential marketing. It aged into being called that.

She also brought the attribution problem. Everything on social media was measurable, and she wanted the same dashboard for the room. The industry obliged with metrics that were defensible in a board presentation and revealed nothing about whether anything had changed for the person in the room. Attendance numbers. Social impressions. Net promoter scores collected forty-eight hours after the closing keynote, when the attendee was on a plane home answering with the same attention she gave to deleting promotional email. None of it measured whether anything happened to the person who showed up. All of it looked good on a slide.

The event app arrived in this decade and confirmed the ATM lesson exactly. It was supposed to enhance the experience by putting the schedule and the map and the networking tool at the attendee’s fingertips. What it actually did was put a portal to everywhere else in her hand and call it event infrastructure. The friction it removed was the friction of not knowing where things were, and that friction had been concealing something: finding your way, asking a stranger for directions, was itself a mechanism of encounter. The app optimized the wayfinding and reduced the serendipity. The ATM had told us this would happen. We were not paying attention.

By 2015 the room had never had more money and had never been more visually sophisticated. It had also never been less certain about what it was for.

Then came 2020

Not as one disruption in the sequence. As all of them at once, and faster than any of them.

Every change that would normally have taken a decade to work through the industry happened in eighteen months. The hybrid question the industry had deferred since the first conference call in the 1980s got answered at global scale in ninety days: yes, you can distribute the content digitally, and no, that is not the same thing as the event. The virtual production that would have taken a decade to professionalize went from novelty to standard because there was no alternative. The speaker who had never done a virtual presentation was doing one by April. The sponsor who had never activated digitally had a digital activation by June.

What the compression revealed was the difference between the industry’s technology and its actual product. The technology accelerated beyond anything a normal decade would have produced. The product became visible by its absence. You could produce a virtual event with broadcast lighting, simultaneous translation, and networking that matched attendees more precisely than any cocktail reception ever had, and people sat through it in their home offices for eighteen months. Then the rooms reopened, they walked back in, and they felt something they could not fully name but had been missing with a specificity that surprised them.

Not the content. The content had been fine on Zoom. What they felt was the room itself. The eye contact across a table that changes what you say next. The conversation that started because you were both at the coffee station and one of you said something unrehearsed. The moment in a hallway where someone said the thing that reorganized how you thought about your work, and you were not recording it and could not rewind it and had to hold it carefully all the way back to your seat, because it mattered and you knew it mattered, and the knowing was part of what made it matter.

Every disruption before this one had clarified the room by removing from it what did not require it. This one clarified it by removing it entirely and letting the industry see, in the eighteen months of its absence, exactly what had been there all along.

Which is exactly where we are now

Fifty years of disruption. The Letraset and the Selectric and the fax and the room block and the attrition clause and the ATM and the internet and Cvent and Eventbrite and the social media chief and the event app and the pandemic that compressed every decade into eighteen months. And now AI, arriving at a moment when every other variable is also in motion.

The GLP-1 drugs are changing how the people in the room relate to food. The loneliness epidemic is changing why they come. Remote work is changing where they are for the other three hundred and sixty-two days of the year. Climate accounting is changing the justification for flying them anywhere. The contract is failing under information asymmetries that real-time data has made indefensible. And private equity money is arriving in venue ownership and event technology at the same time, concentrating both in the hands of platforms that understand yield optimization better than they understand what makes a gathering worth attending. Every variable in motion. All the middles arriving at once. Again, and faster.

In the middle of it is the same question that was there when I sat down with a box of Letraset in 1975 and tried to convince three hundred people that a specific room on a specific night was worth being in. What does this room make possible that nothing else can?

Every decade taught me what the wrong answer looks like. The room that justified itself by its information lost the argument when the internet made information free. The room that justified itself by its production values lost the argument when Instagram made production values available to anyone with a smartphone and a willing florist. The room that justified itself by its speaker lineup lost the argument when podcasts made the same ideas available on demand before the attendee had boarded the plane. The room that justified itself by the dashboard the marketing chief wanted lost the argument when the dashboard measured everything except whether anything had changed for the person inside it. Fifty years of wrong answers, each one necessary, each one leaving the right answer slightly more visible than before. And each one arriving faster than the last.

Jack Morton watched the audience instead of the act. Buck Freeman built the infrastructure and never stopped believing that operational excellence was a form of respect for the people in the room. George P. Johnson turned a Detroit flag shop into the art of the branded environment and proved a company’s whole argument could stand inside an exhibit. Earl Hargrove drove the parade float because the gathering was democracy making itself visible and that was not something you missed. Joe Goldblatt pledged two hundred dollars because the work deserved a discipline. Chad Kaydo held a journalistic standard against the pressure to be merely promotional because the industry deserved coverage that told it the truth. All of them working on the same proposition Buck Freeman staked out in 1927 when he opened a decorating office in Des Moines and decided that the way a room feels is worth building deliberately.

The next piece in this series is the attempt to say what the right answer looks like, in the decade between now and 2036. Forty-four predictions about what changes, what dies, what gets rebuilt, and what turns out to have been the product all along.

Fifty years of the room surviving everything that was supposed to replace it, each disruption arriving faster than the last, each one leaving its irreplaceable value slightly clearer. I think we are finally close enough to the thing itself to say plainly what it is for.

The room remains. The question is whether the industry finally knows why.

The GatheringPoint Field Guide to 2036 publishes next week.

David Adler is the founder of GatheringPoint.news. He founded BizBash in 2000 and spent nineteen years building it into the largest media platform in the events industry. He has been in this room since 1975.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news.

The Curator’s Brief: what I am seeing, and the people I am putting in front of you.

Subscribe now

First, yes, the world is nuts

The world is unhinged... a war with no off-ramp... a heat dome cooking Europe... the Pentagon reportedly ordering up testosterone tests... AI scrambling what we know. The World Cup and the 250th Anniversary done and gone… And yet we keep booking the rooms, which may be the sanest move going. Destinations International hits Portland this week, then August: ASAE, SISO, NACE, IBTM. Plans for Middle East Events up in the. air, Now, the people you should know if you don’t and some interesting ideas…

What About a Neutral Industry Scoreboard for B2C and B2B Events? I met Arturo Guillen, who found the hole in our industry-

Arturo Guillen runs WOW FC, the Madrid fight promotion. In DC for the cage matches, he named the thing I cannot stop repeating: our industry has no scoreboard. Broadway has one, movies have Comscore, concerts have Pollstar. We have nothing. He read box-office data for twenty-six years, backed WOW on the trend, and sees the hole. The kicker: as private equity floods in, it will demand real numbers, not vibes. Read my story →

The GatheringPoint 100

Which is why I am building the GatheringPoint 100, a map of who actually drives the gathering economy. The consolidation proves the point... Apollo is fusing Emerald and Questex under Paul Miller. Who belongs in the hundred? Have ideas for companies to be included: send me a note: David@gatheringpoint.new

I have watched Exhibition Vet Martha Donato build something rare

Martha Donato built thirty-three worlds nobody asked for, mostly on her own dime, and made herself mayor of each. What I have watched up close is her magical network, the room where the industry’s next generation is quietly forming. Now UFI’s first North American regional director. The beginning of something.

Click below to read about Martha →

Event Entrepreneur Terry O’Dwyer built the thing he could not stop building

Terry O’Dwyer sold LSX to Informa, then refused the shiny next act. What he could not stop building instead was The Media Entrepreneur Meetup, a founders’ room now housed inside Collingwood. Today he backs Able, an AI platform for smaller media and events shops. A masterclass in building the room, not the empire.

Click below to read the story about Terry.

The GatheringPoint 100- I need your input?

Which is why I am building the GatheringPoint 100, a map of who actually drives the gathering economy. The consolidation proves the point... Apollo is fusing Emerald and Questex under Paul Miller. Who belongs in the hundred? Have ideas for companies to be included: send me a note: David@gatheringpoint.new

A second look at Freeman’s Janet Dell

Freeman does not rent four walls, it conjures them: a Toronto lot becomes a Live Nation stadium, an Iowa cornfield the Field of Dreams ballpark. On a third straight USA TODAY Top Workplace title, I reopened the Janet Dell file. Her move: run the company the way you run an event, the gospel she preaches at Camp Buck.

Reread my story below→

Let Socrates Plan (or give you ideas) For Your Next Event

The project I am most fired up about: advice on your next event from the greatest gatherers who ever lived. With AI, now you can, and I spent months capturing their wisdom

The full council: Socrates, Aristotle, Confucius, Cleopatra, Leonardo da Vinci, Voltaire, Madame Geoffrin, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, Dolley Madison, Prince Albert, Alexander von Humboldt, Eleanor Roosevelt, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Sam Rayburn, Ida B. Wells, Martin Luther King Jr., George Fox, Deganawida, Mamie Fish, and Dorothy Parker. Twenty-one hosts, each with a hard opinion about your room. Socrates goes first. Meet the council →

With all the talk about Ballrooms, I thought I would take a deeper dive. Ever wonder why we call it a ballroom?

P.S. July calls for the most fun thing in the archive: my romp through eight decades of event fashion, ballrooms to lanyards. Your beach read. Flip through it →

That is the brief. The world is nuts; we gather anyway. See you on the floor in Portland, and back Monday.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news/subcribe

Subscribe now

Look for my 44 predictions for 2036 coming later this week.

Here is the part worth saying out loud. I did the reading the old way, chasing sources and footnotes, but I also fed the whole history into Google’s NotebookLM and let it build a short video version. Watching it assemble the story was a small marvel.

People love to catalogue everything wrong with AI, and plenty is wrong, and I stay skeptical about the real dangers. But if you keep your own hand on the wheel and point these tools at your curiosity instead of outsourcing it, this is an amazing time to be a curious person. A question that used to cost a library afternoon now opens in seconds, and it opens for everyone. Do not surrender your agency. Aim it at something you have always wondered about. The full piece follows.

How the Ballroom Lost Its Ball

With all the popular culture talk about ballrooms, I thought it would be fun to take a deeper dive. Book a ballroom this week and here is what you will actually get: a beige room with a dropped ceiling, a carpet patterned like a migraine, a structural column in the worst possible spot, and a nine a.m. slot for a session on compliance. Nobody will dance. Nobody has danced in that room in years. And yet the word sitting on the banquet order, the word everyone says without hearing it, is ballroom. There is a ball in there. An actual one, the kind with an orchestra and a grand staircase, and it has been quietly haunting the hotel function room for about a century.

The story of how a room built for dancing became the most flexible, most rented, most anonymous box in the building is also, in miniature, the story of the whole gathering economy. It runs from a king who caught fire on the dance floor to a Gilded Age hotel that turned the private party into a public product, and it ends in a carpeted hall where the chandeliers stayed and the waltzing left. Here is how the ballroom lost its ball.

There is a ball in ballroom

Say the word slowly and the history falls out of it. Ball, meaning a formal dancing party, entered English in the 1630s, borrowed from the French bal and the Late Latin ballare, to dance, which traces back to the Greek ballizein, to leap and throw the body around. The same root gives us ballet and ballad. The room came later. Ballroom is first recorded in 1724, and for almost all of the word’s life it meant one thing only: the room where you danced. Not the room where you convened, or broke out into working groups, or plated chicken for six hundred. The room where you danced.

When a ball could kill you

And the dancing was not beige. The great balls of history were spectacles of light, risk, and power, and occasionally they were lethal. In 1393, at a royal celebration in Paris, King Charles VI of France and five noblemen danced costumed as wild men, their linen soaked in resin to hold the shaggy look together. A torch caught one of them. Four of the six burned to death. The king survived only because the young Duchess of Berry threw her skirt over him, and one dancer saved himself by leaping into a vat of wine. History files it as the Bal des Ardents, the Ball of the Burning Men, which is worth keeping in mind the next time a venue frets over an open-flame permit.

Two centuries later, Louis XIV danced his court into obedience at Versailles, where a ball was statecraft in silk slippers. And when Europe met to redraw its borders at the Congress of Vienna across 1814 and 1815, the diplomats threw so many balls that the Prince de Ligne is remembered for the quip that the Congress did not march, it danc

ed. For most of its life, the ballroom was where nations flirted and empires changed hands.

The first room you could rent

The room became a business the moment society did. The direct ancestor of every hotel ballroom on earth is the eighteenth-century assembly room, a public space you paid to enter, where the gentry gathered to dance, play cards, drink tea, and be seen. Almack’s opened in London in 1765 and invented the velvet rope. Admission ran by a nontransferable voucher, handed out by a committee of aristocratic patronesses who cared more about breeding than money, and the refreshments were famously grim: tea, lemonade, bread and butter, plain cake, nothing stronger. The first exclusive ticketed venue in the modern sense served worse food than your last conference, and it still kept a waiting list.

The Bath Assembly Rooms followed in 1771, a purpose-built suite of ballroom, tea room, and card room. This is the hinge of the whole story. The ball stopped being something a king staged inside his palace and became something an ordinary person of means could book.

Who put the ballroom in the hotel

No single genius moved the ball into the hotel. It took two moves on two sides of the Atlantic. In 1889 the impresario Richard D’Oyly Carte opened the Savoy in London, hired a young manager named César Ritz and a chef named Auguste Escoffier, and together they made it fashionable, even a little scandalous, for high society to dine and socialize in public, inside a hotel, rather than behind the closed doors of a private house. That broke the seal.

Then New York finished the job. The Waldorf opened in 1893 and the adjoining Astoria in 1897, and the combined Waldorf-Astoria’s ballroom became the stage on which the Gilded Age performed itself. The proof arrived in February 1897 with the Bradley-Martin ball, staged inside the Waldorf dressed as Versailles, hundreds of guests in period costume, a reported fortune spent in the middle of an economic depression, which is exactly why the papers covered it as both a party and a scandal. The hotel ballroom had found its purpose: the room where a city’s social ambition became visible for one night. Seven decades later, when Truman Capote wanted to throw the century’s defining party, his Black and White Ball of November 1966, he did not build a room. He booked one, the Grand Ballroom of the Plaza.

The dancing stopped and the word stayed

Then, sometime in the twentieth century, the ballroom quietly changed jobs, and almost nobody noticed. You can date the drift from the arrival of a new term, function room, first recorded in 1922. A function room is a space defined not by what it is but by what it can be made to do. The chandeliers stayed. The dancing left. The ballroom became a flexible box for banquets, then conventions, then trade shows, then the breakout session and the sales kickoff and the Saturday wedding and the Sunday memorial. Vienna still holds the line, throwing more than four hundred and fifty balls a year in its winter season and guarding the word’s original meaning. Everywhere else, ballroom became the polite, historical name for the largest empty box in the building.

Which returns us to that nine a.m. compliance session under the migraine carpet. The planner who booked it is renting, without knowing it, the faded ghost of a room where kings caught fire and empires danced. The ball is still there, sitting inside the name. We just wheeled in a projector screen and set it down in front of the staircase that used to be.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news.

Here is an idea that our industry needs: What a fight promoter who spent twenty-six years counting movie tickets taught me about the gap at the center of our industry

There was a cage on the South Lawn of the White House recently. Ilia Topuria defended his UFC lightweight title inside it, on federal grounds, in front of a crowd sitting in folding chairs where presidents have walked their dogs and hosted state dinners. Washington was being genuinely strange, even by its current standards.

I was not there, and neither was my brother, whose close YPO friend happens to be the man who built the promotion Topuria fights for. That man is Arturo Guillén, the founder of WOW FC, a Madrid-based fight promotion, and I spent time with him recently in Washington. The conversations we had reminded me of an idea I have not been able to let go of, an idea that has nothing to do with cage fighting and everything to do with the business most of the people reading this have spent their careers inside.

Here is the idea, plainly stated: the gathering economy, the trade shows and consumer expos and medical congresses and fan conventions and regional home shows and agricultural fairs and gaming tournaments that collectively represent one of the largest mobilizations of human attention on earth, has no public scoreboard. Every other form of live experience built one years ago. We never did. And I think it is time to talk seriously about what it would take to change that.

The man who spent twenty-six years counting tickets

A case for a neutral scoreboard for the industry?

Arturo Guillén did not come to fighting through fandom. He came to it through data, which is where he came to almost everything. For most of his career he ran the global theatrical box office for what eventually became Comscore Movies , overseeing Europe, the Middle East, and India for an operation that tracked ticket sales across tens of thousands of screens in more than seventy countries. When you buy a movie ticket in a Comscore market, the sale travels down an electronic pipe into a central system almost immediately. By the next morning, before the trades can print the story, the industry knows exactly how many people went to the movies, to which titles, in which territories, and what they spent. Not a survey. Not a model. A near-census of an entire entertainment category, reconciled overnight, every single day.

Who is Arturo Guillén in song. Putting out an idea that should be considered.

He did not stumble into the fight business because he loved violence. He was skeptical of it, by his own account, the way most people are before they actually look. The UFC was a client of his data company, which had been hired to measure attendance for the sport. Arturo went to see what he had been measuring, and what changed his mind was not the fighting. It was the training. Young people in a gym, learning through physical discipline something they had not been able to learn anywhere else, about focus, about pressure, about who they were when things got hard. A data man talked himself out of his own prejudice with evidence, which is a more honest origin story than the usual conversion narrative and considerably more useful, because it means the snobbery that keeps most of the events industry from paying attention to combat sports is something he personally overcame by actually looking.

What he built out of that conversion is instructive in ways that go well beyond the cage. WOW FC ran six years of sold-out events in Spain before Topuria became a world champion, and before Cristiano Ronaldo became a shareholder. The celebrity arrived after the audience. That sequence is not incidental. It is the whole lesson. The name is an accelerant for demand you have already located. It cannot manufacture demand from nothing. Every operator who has ever been told to go get a big name to drive ticket sales should understand that the name is the last move, not the first, and that doing it first is how you lose your shirt on a beach with no tents.

He also understood, from two and a half decades of box office data, that measurement is not an epilogue. It is the precondition. The movie industry does not have a feel for its audience. It has the number, and it has it before the news can print it. That is what an industry looks like when it has decided its audience data is an asset rather than an afterthought.

The sensors are there. The spine is not.

I want to be precise about the gap, because the events industry tends to hear “you need better data” and think it means buying new technology. That is not what I am saying. The technology arrived years ago and the good operators use it: RFID badges that log every session entry, Bluetooth beacons that map floor movement to within a few meters, heat maps that show which aisles ran hot and which booths sat empty by two o’clock on the second day, lead-retrieval systems capturing every exhibitor conversation. The Professional Convention Management Association has tracked nearly a hundred sessions at its own flagship event this way. The sensors exist.

What does not exist is the spine. Comscore’s power was never the turnstile. It was that one reconciled feed covered tens of thousands of screens across seventy countries, every day, in the same format, so a trend in one market was legible against every other. The events industry collects the same class of data and then strands it: a heat map that lives in one exhibitor’s post-show deck, a dwell-time report the venue keeps and the organizer never sees, a registration list that never gets joined to last year’s, three vendors whose systems do not speak. Each show starts its measurement over from zero. Comscore would have been worthless if every theater chain kept its numbers in a different drawer. That is precisely how most event portfolios keep theirs.

The result is an industry that knows its own gate and cannot see the market. Your show knows how it did. It cannot tell you whether consumer shows in your category are growing or contracting nationally. It cannot tell you which niches are heating up in markets three time zones over, or which buyer cohort is starting to surge a full cycle before your competitors notice. It cannot tell you whether the regional home show is gaining ground on the regional garden show, or whether the medical congress in one specialty is pulling attendees that used to go somewhere else. These are not exotic questions. They are the questions that determine where capital should go, which shows deserve investment, and which categories are about to break before anyone can see it coming.

What every other attention economy figured out. Film has Comscore. Music has Pollstar, which has tracked concert grosses since 1981. The Broadway League has published its weekly box office numbers since 1979, every single week, without interruption, so anyone can see what the New York theater market is doing in real time. Sports has a century of public attendance data so deeply embedded in the culture that the numbers are part of how fans talk about whether a franchise deserves to survive.

The gathering economy sits at the center of all of them. It asks more of its audience than any of them, more money, more time, more logistical commitment, more advance planning, more of the finite resource that everyone in live experience is competing for. And it has no equivalent of any of it. No neutral behavioral census. No weekly number. No public scoreboard that lets the whole industry see itself moving at once.

There is a number attached to that seat now, and the timing is almost too neat. Recently a private equity firm called Advaya Capital bought the Comscore box office division outright for about seventy million dollars in cash, restoring its original name, Rentrak. Consider what changed hands. Transaction-level data from roughly thirty-four thousand theaters and more than two hundred thousand screens across seventy-plus countries, covering about ninety-five percent of the global box office and nearly all of North America’s. Studios and exhibitors use it for release strategy, financial settlements, talent compensation, licensing decisions. The buyer called it the gold standard for nearly fifty years and intends to deepen the dataset and build predictive analytics on top of it.

Arturo joins the Rentrak board. Sit with the shape of that. The man who spent twenty-six years counting tickets, then built a fight promotion on what the counting taught him, is now on the board of the counting house itself while fresh capital pours in to expand it. He is on both sides of the line at once, the operator and the scorekeeper.

Now hold that seventy million against our own industry. That is the price of the scoreboard for one entertainment category, a category with fewer venues than we have convention centers and exhibit halls. The gathering economy is larger, more fragmented, and moves more money through more cities, and it has no equivalent asset because no one ever built one. There is nothing to buy. The seat in ours is not just empty. It has never been occupied, which means nobody has ever collected the rent.

CEIR , the Center for Exhibition Industry Research, which operates inside IAEE (https://www.iaee.com/), does real and serious work. I want to be clear about that because CEIR deserves its due and because the distinction matters. But CEIR is deep research, periodic and modeled, built for the B2B exhibition world and not designed to function as a public, real-time census across the full gathering economy. It is closer to an academic journal than a box office report. The industry is fortunate to have it. It is not the same thing as the scoreboard I am describing, and the people who run it know that better than anyone. My first call when this idea started taking shape was to the researcher at IAEE who knows that data landscape as well as anyone alive. She agreed the gap was real.

What the scoreboard would actually show us

Imagine a weekly number. Not one show’s registration count sitting in one organizer’s spreadsheet, but an aggregate read across categories: consumer shows up or down, trade show attendance in manufacturing trending which direction, medical congresses in which specialties drawing bigger rooms, fan conventions in which niches breaking out in which markets. The kind of forward signal that tells an operator, or an investor, or a first-time entrepreneur, where the audience appetite is moving before the rest of the field can see it.

Arturo knew where mixed martial arts was going in Spain years before the mainstream noticed, because he had been reading audience data across the whole entertainment category long enough to recognize a pattern when it was still forming. He built six years of shows on that read before a single global name attached to it. The scoreboard did not make him a genius. It made him legible to himself. It gave him a position in a real market instead of a feeling about a private one.

That is what the gathering economy has never had. Not a feeling. A position. The ability to see your own show against the whole field, your category against the other categories, your market against the markets where something is quietly happening that you are the last to know about.

An open question to this community

I want to be honest about the limits of what I know. I am not announcing a company. I am not presenting a finished architecture. I do not have the full picture of what building this would take, who the right partners would be, or what the governance of a neutral third party would need to look like to earn the trust of an industry that is competitive and protective of its own numbers.

What I do believe is that the dataset I am describing, a public, neutral, behavioral census of the gathering economy that runs weekly and spans categories, is something the market would value and the industry is ready for. Every comparable attention economy built this infrastructure and was valued accordingly once it existed. The gathering economy is the last one that has not.

I will say this plainly. If I were not past seventy I would not be writing about this idea from the outside. I would be leading it. I know enough about what is missing and why it matters to have made that the work. But the person who builds this does not need to be me. They need to understand what Arturo understood, that the neutral party in the middle, the one everyone trusts to hold the number, ends up owning something more durable than any single show. That seat is still empty. Someone in this community should take it.

If others see the gap the same way I do, I am happy to play whatever role makes sense. GatheringPoint is a good place to start that conversation, and this feels like the right moment to open it.

The cage on the South Lawn is gone. The gap in our industry is still there. That is the story I came back from Washington wanting to tell.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news (https://gatheringpoint.news/subscribe).

There is a peculiar quiet that follows a successful exit, a kind of silence that feels, at first, like a reward and then, not long after, like something closer to exposure. The machinery that once structured every day falls away, the calendar empties, and the external signals that once confirmed progress are replaced by something far less reliable. The question of what comes next is no longer answered by momentum. It is answered by judgment, and judgment, when it is no longer buffered by necessity, becomes an unusually demanding companion.

Terry O’Dwyer found himself in that space after the sale of LSX, the Life Science Executive Network, to Informa in 2023, a transaction that, from the outside, appeared to complete a clean and disciplined founder arc. LSX had been built with intention, scaled with care, and positioned as a platform where biotech executives, investors, and pharmaceutical dealmakers could meet in ways that produced actual outcomes rather than the vague promise of them. It was the kind of business that confirmed its value not in attendance numbers or atmosphere, but in the quiet accumulation of decisions that happened because the right people had been placed in proximity at the right moment.

https://collingwood.group/stories/collingwood-advises-on-the-sale-of-lsx-ltd-to-informa-plc/

What the transaction did not resolve was the more complicated matter of what to do with the freedom it created. It is tempting, at that stage, to reach for the next available narrative, to find something that feels like a natural extension of the first act or, better still, an elevation of it. O’Dwyer resisted that temptation long enough to notice it. Instead of moving quickly, he began to take the situation apart, not in the abstract language of opportunity, but in the more uncomfortable language of self-assessment.

He considered, in practical terms, the three paths available to him. Starting again from nothing would have satisfied the familiar founder instinct, the desire to construct something entirely one’s own. Acquiring a business offered a different appeal, the chance to impose order and direction on something that already existed but had not yet reached its potential. Joining an emerging venture would allow him to apply his energy without insisting on authorship from the outset. Each option carried its own logic, and for a period he leaned toward acquisition, drawn to a company in the mental health and wellbeing space that aligned with his personal interests and suggested a second act that would read as more explicitly meaningful.

It is here that the story might easily have taken a more predictable turn. The founder, having achieved commercial success, reinvents himself in a space that signals purpose, aligning personal conviction with professional effort in a way that feels both admirable and narratively satisfying. O’Dwyer came close enough to that path to recognize its appeal. What pulled him back was not doubt about the sector, but a more precise discomfort with his own motivation. The closer he looked, the clearer it became that he was responding to the way the decision would sound rather than the way the work would unfold. The business might have held emotional resonance, but it did not align with the pattern of how he actually operates when he is at his most effective. It would have been, in his own framing, an emotional investment, and one that risked substituting narrative coherence for operational truth.

He stepped away from it before it hardened into a commitment, a decision that, in retrospect, explains far more about his second act than any single company he might have chosen to build. What replaced that near-miss was not a sweeping reinvention, but a clearer articulation of something that had been present all along. He is not, at core, a founder driven by subject matter. What animates him is the act of construction itself, and more specifically, the construction of environments in which the right people come into alignment and something begins to move with purpose. Capital moves. Ideas advance. Decisions, which might otherwise take months, compress into moments.

The Terrance O’Dwyer Story in Song

Once that pattern is named, it becomes visible everywhere in his story. At Terrapinn, where he spent close to a decade, he learned the mechanics of B2B events in sectors that had little tolerance for abstraction. Oil, gas, transport, industries where a gathering functions as a working environment rather than a stage. The lesson was not subtle. A well-designed event is not an accessory to business. It is the business, assembled in time and space so that interactions can occur with unusual intensity.

LSX was a more refined expression of that idea, a platform built around curated access and structured interaction, where the emphasis fell not on programming for its own sake, but on facilitating exchanges that would not have occurred without the architecture surrounding them. Its success followed from that clarity.

The same instinct, stripped of any formal structure, can be seen much earlier. As a child, he found ways to create small systems of exchange, selling door to door, launching a school newspaper that circulated information among his classmates, discovering, without naming it, that value often emerges when something begins to move within a defined group. In high school, he moved across different environments, from drama to debate to sports to academics, less as a search for identity than as an immersion in different forms of group behavior. Each setting revealed a different rhythm of interaction, a different way in which attention, pressure, and influence organize themselves.

He now speaks about his self diagnosed and probably not scentifically accurate, ADHD with a candor that feels less like disclosure and more like explanation, a way of describing the speed and associative quality of his thinking alongside the structural discipline required to make that thinking useful over time. Ideas arrive quickly. Connections form easily. The instinct to begin is rarely in short supply. The challenge, which he understands clearly, lies in sustaining momentum through the less visible middle of execution. His solution has not been to reshape himself into something else, but to build around that reality, surrounding himself with people whose strengths lie in continuity, in follow-through, in the steady work of turning an initial spark into something durable.

Nowhere is that pattern more visible than in the founder community he created almost inadvertently while building LSX. A series of one-on-one conversations with other media and events founders gradually revealed a simple gap. These were people operating at similar levels, facing similar pressures, and yet they were not connected to one another in any meaningful way. The response was not strategic so much as instinctive. He brought them together.

What began as informal drinks evolved into regular lunches, and then into something more structured, though never fully formalized. The Media Entrepreneur Meetup became a space in which founders could exchange ideas with a degree of candor that is difficult to achieve in more public settings, testing assumptions, comparing experiences, and, at times, admitting uncertainty without the usual performance that accompanies it. The group grew because it addressed a real need, and during Covid, when isolation sharpened that need, it expanded further, becoming a global community supported by ongoing conversation, virtual gatherings, and shared resources.

At that stage, the opportunity to convert the network into a conventional business would have been obvious. Instead, O’Dwyer allowed it to evolve into something slightly different. The group found a more formal home within Collingwood, a firm operating at the intersection of advisory, growth strategy, and corporate finance for media and events businesses.

The arrangement made strategic sense, connecting the community more directly to capital, deal flow, and the kinds of decisions founders eventually face. What is more revealing is the boundary he maintained. He did not attempt to optimize the group into a product or extract immediate revenue from its existence. He preserved the conditions that had made it valuable in the first place, the openness of the exchanges, the relevance of the participants, and the sense that involvement was driven by necessity rather than transaction.

This instinct toward alignment, toward allowing things to become what they are best suited to be rather than forcing them into a predefined model, carries directly into his current work. Rather than starting from scratch or acquiring a business that did not fit his pattern, he chose to join and invest in a venture that operates in a space where his instincts remain relevant. Able, an AI for Business Leaders platform, is focused on the practical adoption of artificial intelligence within small and mid-sized media and events companies, translating a broad technological shift into something that can be used, tested, and integrated within real operating environments.

The surface has changed, but the underlying logic has not. It is still about identifying where movement is beginning, bringing the right people into proximity, and constructing a framework in which that movement can accelerate.

For founders considering their own second acts, the lesson here is not about the specific choices O’Dwyer made, but about the discipline behind them. Opportunity, after a successful exit, is rarely in short supply. The more difficult task is interpretation, the ability to distinguish between what feels compelling in the moment and what will sustain itself over time. It requires a willingness to step back from momentum, to question instincts without abandoning them, and to recognize that the next move does not need to be larger or louder, only more precisely aligned.

O’Dwyer could have built almost anything.

What he chose instead was to build in a way that fits how he actually works, a narrower, more exacting path that trades narrative appeal for something more durable, and, in the long run, far more useful.

https://smallbitearchitectutr.lovable.app/people/terren-o-dwyer Terry O'Dwyer: The founder who resisted the wrong next act and chose the work that actually fits how he builds Edible portraits designed to capture who they are in a single taste.

Every entrepreneur knows the first half of the story, even if no one warns them about it going in. You put your head down. You build the thing nobody asked you to build, alone, on your own money, with no org chart to confer a title and no communications department to announce that you exist. You get very good at something while almost no one is watching, and for years the two facts of your life refuse to meet, the private excellence and the public silence, until it starts to seem possible they never will. This is the part of the entrepreneurial life that the founder mythology skips, the long-isolated middle where the work is real and the recognition is nowhere, and it is the part Martha Donato lived for the better part of three decades. She was building consumer shows that drew twenty thousand people and conferences a beat ahead of their markets, thirty-three events in all, financed out of her own pocket, and she was doing it in a kind of professional solitude that anyone who has ever started something will recognize in their chest.

What makes her worth a profile is the second half, the part that is harder to engineer and impossible to fake. The entrepreneur who has spent years building in isolation eventually does something a corporate climber never gets to do. She does not find a town and angle for a seat on its council. She founds the town, and the person who founds it governs by simple authorship, the way a settlement’s first citizen becomes its mayor without anyone needing to hold an election. This is the trait that organizes Donato’s entire life, and it explains why she would have been good at almost anything. What she has is not industry knowledge or a Rolodex, though she has both. It is the older and less teachable instinct to walk into a subject she knows nothing about, build a world around it, and discover that she is standing at the center of the thing she made. In her ecosystem, whatever she creates, she is the mayor of her niche, and she has created a great many niches.

She has built a remarkable number of those worlds, and the proof of the trait is in how little the subjects have in common. A consumer comic convention, handed to her when she knew nothing about comics, that she grew into a twenty-thousand-person spectacle. A drone conference for emergency responders when drones were still a toy. A think tank on the gap between the electric vehicles Washington mandated and the charging grid that did not exist. A blockchain event for the pharmaceutical industry before most people could define the word. A professional network for the women who run the industry’s towns. Thirty-three events in all, comics to drones to batteries to blockchain, each one a small town she founded and then governed, not by appointment but by authorship. The single exception, the one ecosystem she did not build herself, is the one that has lately put her on the international stage, and it is worth seeing precisely because it is the outlier that proves the rule.

She grew up in Bainbridge, in the part of upstate New York that calls itself the Central Leatherstocking Region, foothills of the Catskills, closer to Binghamton than to anything anyone outside the county has heard of. Her father was an engineer who worked the factories back when upstate still had them. Her mother worked in the schools and then at the plant that is now called Amphenol and used to be called Bendix, making the electrical connectors that go into aircraft, taking every extra shift she could get after the divorce. Donato was the oldest of five, with an Irish-twin brother a year behind her, and what that arrangement produces, when the mother is always at work trying to make the ends meet, is a child who runs the household. She was in charge of her siblings before she was old enough to understand that being in charge was a skill some people never acquire.

By high school the pattern had hardened into something a guidance counselor could put on a plaque. She was not the cheerleader. She was the head of the student council, elected unopposed, and when she graduated, they hung a plaque on the wall that read best citizen, and it is, she notes, still there. The first event she ever produced was her own high school prom, auditorium decorated and entertainment booked. The second category, the one she is funnier about, was the parties she threw at the house when her mother was working nights, which she ran with the same operational rigor she would later bring to consumer shows drawing twenty thousand people.

She has never once been a citizen of somebody else’s town. Long before Chicago, before UFI, she was mayor of a high school gymnasium on prom night and mayor of her mother’s kitchen when the party ran low on ice and needed a runner sent for more. The office just kept getting bigger. The skill never changed.

The only event that defeated her control was the graduation party where a classmate climbed the family flagpole and bent it permanently sideways, a structural failure she could not explain to her mother and did not try.

This is the formative logic, and it matters because it explains the thing she became known for and the thing she could not, for years, allow herself to claim. Donato learned leadership as a form of caretaking, and caretaking does not announce itself. It works best when no one notices it is happening. She carried that straight into her first real job in New York, where she had moved from Brooklyn to take classes and work in advertising at Grey, and then talked her way out of a Madison Avenue employment agency and into a role at Editel, the post-production house that cut The Cosby Show. She was assistant to the CEO. She managed his calendar, planned the events, kept the operation calm. From him she absorbed the discipline that would define her for the next twenty years, delivered as a set of instructions that doubled as a worldview. Be unfailingly polite, because the tempers in that business ran hot. Never let them see you sweat. And whatever happens in this office, at this level, is nobody’s business but ours, so do not go telling stories out of school. She took the last one as a sacred trust. In an era she describes as high-stakes gossip with pink slips flying, she knew a great deal and repeated none of it. The keeping of confidences is not a glamorous talent. It is, however, the talent that makes a person indispensable to powerful people, and Donato had it before she had anything else.

She moved through the video world into a sales role across the river in New Jersey, where she learned the commercial side of corporate America in the years around 1990, a period she describes with the flat candor of someone who lived it and does not expect to be believed. It was male-dominated and gratuitous in ways she says younger people would not credit if she spelled them out. She does not spell them out. What she took from it was sales, which she is careful to name as the foundation under everything the industry does, and then she carried that into publishing, and publishing is where the real story starts.

The publisher was Wizard Entertainment, a fan-magazine group built on the traditional media model where a little print operation makes its real money selling ads. In 1996 Wizard bought a thing called Chicago Comic Con, and Donato, by then the marketing director, was told the company had acquired this comic thing and would she mind taking a look. Six weeks later the brief had changed. The team running the show was not working out, and would she fly to Chicago and release them, and then they would, in the comfortable phrase that meant the opposite of what it said, figure it out. Figuring it out meant Donato. She ran a twenty-thousand-person consumer show with no experience producing a formal event, went from zero to a hundred over a single weekend, and spent part of that weekend crying behind a hotel door because she did not understand the rules or why there were so many of them. Then she went home and realized she had loved it.

What she loved is the thing that has organized the rest of her thinking about gatherings, and it is worth slowing down on, because it is the intellectual core of why she is good at this. Comic Con was not a market of buyers and sellers, which is the reduction the trade applies to everything. It was community happening in real time, the first time she had ever watched it happen at scale. The booths were not sales positions. They were gathering places. The artists were revered, the fans made a pilgrimage to be near them, and the whole apparatus existed so that people who loved a thing could gather under one roof with the people who made the thing, and with each other. She knew nothing about comics. She respected the enthusiasm completely. That distinction, between knowing the subject and honoring the devotion, is what she carried out of Chicago and into every B2B conference she has produced since, including, she points out, an oil and gas event in Houston last week where the man on stage was exactly the man everyone in the hall wanted five minutes alone with, for reasons that were commercial and tribal at the same time. You cannot fake that, she says, and she means it as both an observation about fandom and a thesis about why the industry will survive the machines. The tribalism is real. AI cannot manufacture it.

Then comes the part she calls the non-shiny part, because she is honest enough to flag when she is only giving you the polished version. In March of 2008, into the teeth of the collapse, she was let go from Wizard. The reason was not the economy, or not only the economy. The reason was that she had read the room and said what she saw, which is the other side of the caretaking instinct, the side that does not stay quiet. She had watched the independent comic shops, the small ones that were like bodegas for comic books, three thousand of them by her rough count, begin closing in droves because the distribution model was breaking and the print-first owners would not move to digital. She told the company it needed a real online presence and that the print franchise it was clutching was the fatal flaw. The owners, whose egos she describes as large and whose recent profits had convinced them the gravy train was permanent, decided a senior vice president who would not stop pointing at the iceberg was insubordinate. They released her and several others. Not long after, they closed. She had been right, expensively and unrewardingly right, which is the condition under which the person who reads the room first is usually correct, and usually punished for it.

The pivot, the moment the spotlight first turned toward her and she first tried to step out of its way, came in 2014. By then she had started her own Comic Con in Long Beach, and her general contractor was a man named Marty Glynn, who ran Metropolitan Expositions and wanted out of the back of the house and into show management. She wanted a partner. They discovered they lived in the same town, which is the kind of small-world detail that turns a working relationship into a life. Out of that partnership came MAD Event Management, the firm she still runs as founder and president, with Glynn as chief executive. What Glynn gave her, beyond a business partnership that has launched something like half of the thirty-three events she has put into the world, was a single piece of correction she had needed for twenty years and resisted hearing. Someone had asked her to speak, and she had said no, as she always said no, and Glynn asked her why she was forever putting herself behind the scenes. The next time someone asks, he told her, you say yes.

She said yes. She was, by her own account, awful at it, tongue-tied and red-faced and clutching her notes through the entire first year, the same media-training ordeal that humbles nearly everyone who has ever been good at the part of the job that happens off the dais. She kept doing it anyway, and what she discovered when she did was not that she had conquered a fear but that she had been pointed at the wrong thing the whole time. The visibility was never a personality flaw to be corrected. It was the missing half of a leadership that had been complete and idle for twenty years, waiting for a town to build itself around it. Something happens, she says, when you discover the fear was larger in your head than in the room. What happened, specifically, was that a born leader who had spent two decades doing the work in isolation finally stepped in front of the people she had been quietly serving, and the authority that had nowhere to go for twenty years simply walked out and took its place. The microphone did not make her a leader. It revealed the one she already was.

Those events, built with Glynn across the years that followed, read like a map of where the economy was about to go, each one produced a beat before anyone else arrived. The drone conference ran in Florida and California in 2017 and 2018, when most people had still never seen one overhead. The Detroit think tank sent a room full of government and industry people home agreeing the country had a charging problem nobody was solving. She self-financed nearly all of it out of whatever the other work threw off, never tapping the institutional capital that might have let any one of them scale faster, a regret she states plainly and without drama. The skill was always there. The funding architecture that rewards the skill arrived in the industry later than she did.

The through line is the right one. Donato’s entire career is the practice of reading the terrain, whether the terrain is a single difficult conversation, a twenty-thousand-person hall, or the entire publishing economy in the year before it cracked. She traces the skill to her grandmother and her five aunts, who taught her to listen the way listening used to be done, hands folded, eyes on the person, never forgetting a word she was told. It is not a coincidence that the woman who learned to listen that way became the woman everyone wanted in the room. What she had built, without ever calling it that, was soft power, the kind of influence that does not announce itself and cannot be assigned by a title, the kind that accrues to the person a town instinctively turns toward when something needs deciding. Listening is invisible labor. It is also the quiet machinery of authority, and it is the rarest competence in an industry that mostly talks.

Donato represents a leadership paradigm the events industry is only now learning to name. For most of its history, the skill she spent a lifetime perfecting was treated as support, the soft stuff, the thing the woman in the second chair handled so the man at the microphone could close the deal. That valuation is collapsing, and not for sentimental reasons. The work itself has changed. Leadership scholarship has spent the last two decades quietly dismantling the old assumption that command and technical mastery make the executive, and has installed in its place a less flattering finding, that the ability to read and manage emotion, your own and everyone else’s in the building, is now considered one of the fundamental qualifications for leading anything at all. The relational competence that used to be dismissed as women’s intuition turns out, under the regression analysis, to be the thing that actually moves careers and outcomes. And in this business in particular the stakes are not abstract. Event work ranks year after year among the most stressful jobs there is, a profession of unmovable deadlines and live failure in front of thousands, and the asset that determines who survives it is precisely the emotional read that Donato learned at her grandmother’s kitchen table.

The honest version of the argument is not that women are born better at this, a claim the research does not support, and Donato would be the first to wave off. It is that women were socialized into the relational skill, then penalized for it as though it were a weakness, and the industry is now waking up to discover that the penalized skill is the load bearing one. Add the machines to the equation and the shift accelerates. As artificial intelligence absorbs the logistics, the floor plans, the registration flows, the scheduling that used to fill the job, the only part of convening that cannot be automated is the human read on a crowd, the sensing of when a deal is about to turn or a hall is about to tip. That is the competence rising in value while everything around it commoditizes, and it is the competence the industry spent a generation extracting from women for free. The reason you will see more Martha Donatos in the first chair is not a diversity wave that might recede. It is that the job finally requires, out loud, the thing they were always doing in private.

Which brings us back to the outlier. When the pandemic erased her show calendar and left her, newly divorced and with a teenager still at home, without backup, she assembled a few MAD Event Management clients for cash flow and kept moving. Then in 2022, UFI came calling. The global exhibitions body was taking its congress to the United States for the first time, had never run an event on American soil, and told her, in the most honest brief a consultant can receive, that they did not know what they did not know. Here was the rare territory she had not founded, a town that already had its institutions and its history, and she governed it anyway, the only way she knows how. She did not arrive and demand a title. She served the organization through its first uncertain steps, emceed its European conference, spoke at its global CEO summit, and let the authority accrue slowly and then officially, until the title arrived to ratify what the town had already decided. Regional Director for North America, the first of its kind. It is the most visible thing she has ever been handed, and it tells you less about her than the comic convention she was told to go fix in 1996, because anyone can be appointed to a job. The interesting thing is that she runs a town she inherited exactly the way she runs the towns she built. The mayoralty does not depend on having poured the foundation. It depends on her.

The one town she built that she may be proudest of is the one she gave away, and it is not one she built alone. In 2021, Donato co-founded the North America chapter of the Women in Exhibitions Network alongside Stephanie Selesnick and Laura Purdy, three women who had each spent decades running things in this industry deciding, together, that the industry needed a room of its own where the women actually doing the work could find each other. Donato served as the chapter’s founding president. She holds honorary status now while a new generation carries it forward, which is the most Donato outcome imaginable: build the thing with the people who show up to build it, hand it to the next ones, keep your name on it only because they insisted you must.

The pattern is not hers alone. Look across the people this publication keeps returning to and the same shape appears again and again, someone running something well before anyone hands them a title for it. GatheringPoint’s profile of Howard Givner cast him as “the new mayor of the event agency world,” a founder who built the room the American event agency business had never had before anyone conferred a title on him for it. The instinct precedes the appointment almost every time. That is not a coincidence about individual biography. It is a pattern about how this industry actually selects its leaders. Authority here is rarely handed down from above. It is recognized after the fact, conferred on whoever has already been quietly running the thing while everyone else was still waiting for permission.

The numbers say why this is breaking open now for women specifically. Women make up roughly 77 percent of the event workforce by IBTM’s research, while only 16 percent of women in the industry hold director-level seniority, against 32 percent of men, a gap so wide it stops being a statistic and starts being a structure, the founder’s solitude made female and made permanent. What has changed, and what makes her appointment a story rather than a footnote, is that the top jobs are finally filling with the women who spent decades doing the work beneath them. Clarion Events named Liz Irving chief executive of its North American business at the end of 2024, and elevated Kelly Comboni to lead its Clarion Connect division weeks later, in January 2025. The Women in Exhibitions Network’s North American chapter is now led by Toni Piela of RX, with Danica Tormohlen of Informa Markets having steered it before her, the same Toni Piela whom Donato mentions almost in passing as one of the women now carrying the network forward.

These are not tokens, and they are not a wave. They are a small, specific cohort who held real power for years before anyone thought to put a title on it, and the network Donato helped start to gather them was never a support group. It was a succession plan.

The question that sits under the entire arc is the obvious one. How is it that she is not the CEO of one of the major companies right now. Donato does not flinch from it. The big organizers grow their executives from the inside, she says, out of RX or the old UBM, and she was never one of those homegrown few. And there is the harder question underneath that one, whether she would even have wanted it, the grinding life inside a large corporate machine, and here she gives the most honest answer of all. The younger me would have done terribly, she says. Maybe the older me would do well. I never had a chance to find out. It is the rare admission that lands as neither complaint nor false modesty, just an accurate accounting from a woman who has spent a lifetime accurately accounting for everyone but herself.

She walks the floor on the last morning of every show she produces, after the booths are gone and the hall has emptied back into the echoing space it was designed to be, looking for whatever got left behind. A product sample, a forgotten badge, a business card faces down on the carpet. Evidence that something happened here. A mayor’s job runs the whole distance, the charter and the zoning at one end, the curb and the trash at the other, and Donato has never treated the second half as beneath the first.

For thirty years she did that work in a kind of solitude, the founder’s solitude, building towns for other people to be celebrated in and trusting that the recognition would find her eventually, on its own schedule, the way it finds anyone who serves a community long enough to become indispensable to it. It found her. The lesson she leaves for whoever is building the next thing alone right now, head down, unrecognized, certain it will never connect, is the one her whole life argues. You do not climb into authority, and you do not wait to be appointed to it. You build the town, and you govern what you built, and the title, when it finally comes, only confirms what everyone in town already knew.

She has held some office or another since she was sixteen. Donato built towns for thirty years, gave the most personal one away with the women who built it beside her, and is only now being handed the public version of the authority she has quietly held the whole time. She would have been good at almost anything. The events industry got lucky that the worlds she kept building were theirs.

She Was Mayor of Something Before She Could Vote in a Real Election
Student council president at sixteen, elected unopposed. Her own prom, planned and run. Parties at home while her mother worked nights, a dollar at the door and a runner sent out when the ice ran low. The office kept getting bigger. The instinct never changed.

Listening Is Invisible Labor, and It’s the Load-Bearing Wall
Her grandmother and five aunts taught her to listen hands folded, eyes on the speaker, never forgetting a word. It reads as passive. It is the opposite. It is the quiet machinery that makes a town turn toward you when something needs deciding.

Respect the Devotion Even If You Don’t Know the Subject
She knew nothing about comics when Wizard handed her Chicago Comic Con. What she understood immediately was that the booths were not sales positions, they were gathering places, and the fans were on a pilgrimage. Honoring the fandom, not the merchandise, is what made the show work.

Being Right Early Can Get You Fired
She told Wizard’s owners in 2008 that the print-first model was dying and the company needed a real digital presence. They let her go for insubordination. The company folded not long after. Reading the terrain correctly is not the same as being rewarded for it.

The Fear Is Always Bigger in Your Head Than in the Room
Marty Glynn asked her why she kept saying no to speaking invitations and told her the next time someone asked, she should say yes. She was tongue-tied and red-faced for a year. She kept doing it anyway, and found the authority had been complete and idle the whole time, just waiting for a town to build itself around it.

Build the Company That Lets You Build the Towns
MAD Event Management, founded with Glynn out of the Long Beach partnership, is the vehicle behind roughly half of her thirty-three events. An independent operator needs an independent operation. She built both at once.

Self-Finance What You Can’t Get Funded, and Say So Plainly
Thirty-three events, financed almost entirely out of pocket, never tapping the institutional capital that might have scaled any one of them faster. She names this as a regret without drama. The skill was always there. The funding caught up to her late.

Found the Town With the People Who Show Up to Build It
The Women in Exhibitions Network’s North America chapter was not a solo project. Donato co-founded it with Stephanie Selesnick and Laura Purdy, three women deciding together that the industry needed a room of its own. She served as founding president, then handed it forward and kept only honorary status.

The Skill Dismissed as Soft Is Usually the One That’s Load-Bearing
Emotional intelligence, relational competence, the read on a crowd, all of it was extracted from women for free for a generation and filed under personality rather than qualification. As AI absorbs the logistics, the only thing left that can’t be automated is exactly what she was never credited for.

You Don’t Climb Into Authority, You Grow Into the Town That’s Already Yours
UFI handed her a territory she didn’t found, the first American congress in the organization’s history, and told her honestly they didn’t know what they didn’t know. She ran it the same way she runs everything else. Thirty years in the back of the hall, listening. The title, when it finally came, only confirmed what the town already knew

Why I Do Songs. Every Wisdom Bank piece comes with an original song because a song carries an argument differently than prose does. Prose persuades the reader. A song moves through them. A chorus settles into the back of the head and stays there long after the article has been closed and the laptop has been shut. Martha Donato's song is called "Mayors of Their Own Towns," and it does something this particular profile needed, it widens out from one woman's story into a roll call, because the real subject was never just her. It was the whole quiet generation of women who built the rooms this industry runs on and only recently got the titles to match..

Edible Profile of Martha Donato

Why I Do This. Food is the oldest form of biography. Long before anyone wrote a profile, a family told you who someone was by what they cooked for you, what they served when they wanted to impress you, what they made when someone they loved was hurting. That instinct never left us, it just got buried under a century of generic catering and rubber chicken banquet circuits. Small Bite Architecture is my attempt to dig it back out. Every dish on this page is built from an actual fact of Martha Donato’s actual life, not a theme, not a vibe, a fact. The scallop with the capers is the last morning on an emptied show floor. The canapé that never runs short is a teenager passing a hat at a house party her mother didn’t know was happening. I don’t do this because it’s clever. I do it because a person who has spent thirty years being understood through spreadsheets and org charts deserves, once, to be understood through a plate. One bite, two chews, and you know something true about them that a bio paragraph never gets to

.

Subscribe now

Don Welsh apologizes at the top of the call. He had been on the phone with his daughter Sarah, whose one-year-old has just learned the word hi, and hi plus pop-pop, he reports, is currently the most important thing in the world. This is the man who runs Destinations International, the global association of the people who sell cities, seventy years old, dialing in from Sarasota with the unhurried warmth of a hotel general manager who has all day for you and a flight in an hour.

Consider what that association is. Every city on earth is now in the same business, competing for the scarcest commodity of the age, human attention, and for the conventions, visitors, athletes and capital that follow it. The people hired to win that competition, the destination chiefs of about 800 places across dozens of countries, all report, in a sense, to the same coach. Welsh leads the league the competitors belong to, which makes him something unusual in any industry: the one figure whose job is not to make his city win but to make every city better at playing. When the association talks, ten thousand members listen, from three-person bureaus in small American towns to the tourism authorities of nations.

We establish quickly that we are the same person from different frequencies. He grew up in Baltimore City. I grew up in Washington, but my family owned WAYE, the Baltimore rock and roll station, and I remember riding up from DC with my father during the riots of 1968 because we were covering them. Welsh remembers the riots too, from the other side of the credential. His father was chief clerk of the Baltimore City Council, a part-time gig under Mayor Tommy D’Alesandro, the father of Nancy Pelosi, and when the city burned, the elder Welsh took his twelve-year-old son toward the smoke with the firemen and the policemen. There was a clear line of demarcation, Welsh recalls, between where the riots were taking place and where they were not. The family lived maybe five miles from the line. Two kids of the same era drawn to the same burning city, one formed by the transmitter, one by the front seat of a municipal sedan, both of us destined to spend our lives studying how people come together and what happens when they don’t.

None of Welsh’s Baltimore has ever been in print. His official biography begins, as all of them do, in mid-air: forty years in travel and tourism, Westin, Ritz-Carlton, MGM Grand, then the CEO roles in Seattle, Indianapolis and Chicago, then the 2016 arrival at the association he was tasked to rebuilt. The public record contains no high school, no college, no parents, no boyhood. It turns out the record was hiding a sports movie.

The Catcher Who Lost His Eyes

Welsh went to Calvert Hall, the Christian Brothers school that has been supplying Baltimore with lacrosse players and monsignors since 1845, and he played everything. He was a catcher, and he will tell you he knew he was a much better baseball player than a football player. Then, in eleventh grade, with no hereditary warning, his eyes went. A catcher in glasses, a hitter who cannot pick up the ball, is a boy being handed his first roster cut by his own body. He turned to football, all 5’10” and 210 pounds of him, and in what he cheerfully calls his delusional juvenile mind, he believed he was going to be a great NFL player.

He was not. What he became instead was a member of the Towson University football team that reached the Amos Alonzo Stagg Bowl, the national championship, fifty years ago this fall. And he became the property of a coach named Phil Albert, now deceased, whom Welsh describes as a beautiful person, very spiritual, a man who believed he was raising men to be better human beings and not merely better athletes. Albert had a policy that sounds almost eccentric in the profession of the thrown clipboard: you would probably never hear him yell and rant and rave after a loss. His reasoning was the whole curriculum. If you are a person of character and you gave everything you had, you will have no problem looking at the person in the mirror directly in the eye. If you start shying away from the mirror, you know you didn’t give it your all.

Welsh calls the mirror test his mantra, and once you have heard it, you can see it running under everything he has done for half a century. Ask him how sports shaped his management style and he answers with a self-assessment so unfashionable it stops you: he had, he says, average intelligence. What he had instead was a philosophy. I’ll outwork you.

Free Passes

The gathering economy loves an origin myth, and Welsh’s is better than the one in circulation. The published version says he started as a baggage loader for United Airlines. The full version, which he has never told a reporter, starts with a death and a benefit.

His brother, who has since passed away, worked for United as a manager at BWI. In an Irish Italian Baltimore family where, as Welsh puts it, nobody left, the brother’s job unlocked the one privilege that mattered: free airline passes. His mother started flying him young, Hawaii, Las Vegas, across the United States, a city kid accumulating boarding passes like other boys collected baseball cards. Then there was the uncle, based in Saudi Arabia in the sixties and seventies with Aramco, and who eventually retired to Novato, outside San Francisco. Welsh remembers flying there with his parents, looking around at California, and reaching the conclusion that would organize his life: I don’t think I’m going to be staying in Baltimore like the rest of my family.

He loaded bags through high school and college, and his first legitimate job out of Towson was as a United ticket agent at O’Hare, where he met a flight attendant named Jean. He married her. The romance of the gathering economy is usually a banquet or a ballroom; theirs was a ticket counter in the world’s busiest airport, two people whose jobs were literally moving strangers toward each other.

What did the ramp teach him? He answers first as a romantic, confessing that to this day he can get off an eighteen-hour flight and simply hang around the airport watching airplanes, which he used to do in Hong Kong for pleasure. Then he answers as an operator: you learned the fueling side, the operational side, what happened when a bag was lost. And then, unprompted, he offers the most unguarded self-diagnosis I have heard from a CEO in years. At seventy, he says, he has come to believe he probably would have been diagnosed with some form of ADD or ADHD, and he does not say it lightly. He was highly caffeinated for years, to the point of heart palpitations. But he thinks the wiring served him, because it produced the sentence that explains his entire career: I like when things are either in a building stage or in a broken stage. I’m not a good maintenance person.

A fixer or a builder. The aviation chapters prove it. He left United for Evergreen, the outfit run by Del Smith, the visionary who flew DC-8s into Saigon during the war and later bought the Spruce Goose. Then, in 1980, Welsh became part of the team behind a startup called Horizon Airlines, first flight September 1981, sold to Alaska Airlines in 1986. A young man with no money and no car, commuting between Seattle and McMinnville, Oregon, helping will an airline into the sky. When he answered a blind Wall Street Journal listing that turned out to be Westin, the hotel industry got him almost by accident, and the destination world got him two decades after that.

Tally the seats and you begin to understand why the wisdom overflows. Ramp agent, ticket counter, startup airline founder, hotel corporate at Westin, luxury at Ritz-Carlton, casino at MGM Grand, three destination organizations, one global association. Welsh has worked, at ground level, nearly every link in the chain that moves a human being from a departure gate to a name badge, and he knows it is the source of his authority. If I’ve had any success in this industry, he says, it’s because I’ve worked in the airline industry, I’ve worked in the hotel industry, and I’ve run three DMOs. He can tell you why an airline thinks like a transportation company and will never love your city back, why a hotel’s loyalty lives not in the brand but in the general manager down the street, and why the destination sits in the middle navigating between all of them, because he has drawn a paycheck from every party at that table. The industry is full of executives who studied the ecosystem. Welsh loaded its bags.

The Listening Tour

The chapter that made Welsh an industry legend began in the fall of 2015, when the association then called DMAI discovered it was, in his words, financially upside down. The CEO was let go. Welsh, freshly finished with five record-setting years at Choose Chicago, was recruited by people who had known him since his hotel days and time in Seattle, Indianapolis and Chicago. He did not ask for the job. Between Chicago and the wreckage, he took exactly one break, for a hip replacement, and started March 1, 2016.

What he did next has entered the association playbook, but the inside name for it has not. Welsh went out and personally visited approximately two hundred members, asking each the same three questions: What do you want? What do you need? What will you support? His colleague Chelsea, watching him crisscross the country like a band on the road, printed the dates and gave the campaign its private title: the DI Apology Tour. He was apologizing, he confirms, at the same time he was learning. Out of the answers came the four pillars, community, advocacy, research, education, and out of the pillars came the rename. Marketing left the letterhead because, as he says with a shrug you can hear, ironically, we’re not a marketing organization. The bolder word was the second one. International was, at the time, nearly aspirational; the membership was American with a handful of Canadians and Mexicans. Today there are seventy members in Canada, more than thirty in Europe where three years ago there were none, the Saudi Tourism Authority in a Middle East where DI once had no presence at all, and a Canadian in the board chair. The association that was lying to itself a decade ago now audits the world.

Retiring Gridlock

The most quietly radical thing Welsh says in our conversation is a repudiation of his own greatest hit. In Chicago he had a flippant definition of success, and it was a good line: gridlock. Conventions and tourists in such volume that restaurants were packed, hotels were full, and the buses could barely move. He now describes that thinking as 180 degrees from where the profession must live. The modern destination organization, he argues, succeeds only if it models and emulates the community’s shared values, meaning the brand must align with the neighborhoods and the residents, with the Chicago beyond Michigan Avenue, with Seattle’s guarded and deliberate sense of who it wants to welcome. The job he was originally hired to do, maximize occupancy regardless of what it did, no longer exists. When the industry’s most decorated salesman retires his own best line, something structural has shifted.

What replaced it is a job he describes with the phrase I offered and he immediately claimed: the alternative mayor. The destination chief today is on stage twenty-four hours a day, under the political microscope, managing multiple stakeholders, and in many cases carrying a greater public profile than the elected official next door. Welsh learned the hazard personally in Chicago, where victories were sometimes credited to Choose Chicago and Don Welsh even when Mayor Rahm Emanuel had launched the initiative, an attribution problem that, he allows, did not always fly well between the two of them. He’s proud of what he and Mayor Emanuel accomplished in five years even if it was a challenge at times.

Sit with Welsh long enough and the modern job description assembles itself, and it is a portfolio no business school prepares anyone for. The DMO chief must be the diplomat who brokers a permanent negotiation between parties who want different things: the airlines, which Welsh says have concluded flatly that they are transportation companies and will use a destination for statistics but not for love; the hotel brands, whose loyalty gets granular only at the local level, with the general managers and directors of sales who are, in his phrase, where a community starts coming together; the restaurants, the convention facilities, the elected officials, and above all the residents. The chief must be a financial strategist, because the fight for what Welsh calls your fair share of funding has become the profession’s central anxiety, and a portfolio manager too, filling a convention center with the right business rather than the most business, the way he watches Elliott Ferguson’s team balance citywide bookings in Washington against a town where transient demand arrives whenever Congress is in session. It is a job of strategic balance, he says, performed in public, graded by everyone.

And in most of the world, it is performed by a skeleton crew. Many of DI’s members are organizations with operating budgets of $3-5 million and less than a dozen staff, entrusted with the entire brand of their community, which is why Welsh built the association into a tool chest of shared resources and subject experts, forty full-timers now serving what a small bureau cannot staff for itself. The newest demand arriving on those small desks is the one his CEOs are, in his word, sponges for: making artificial intelligence understandable and applicable, sliced by role, alongside the older unsolved puzzle of leading a multigenerational team that no longer shares one idea of what work is. The consequence of all this weight is the industry’s quietest crisis, which he names without hedging: a lot of people don’t want their jobs. The complexity has outrun the job description, and the profession’s next generation must be recruited into a role that now demands a politician’s skin, an economist’s fluency and a producer’s showmanship

On that last count, Welsh has been leading by conversion. Since he arrived, DI does not hold meetings. We produce shows, he says, a music fanatic building every convention around a musical and visual theme, this year borrowing from the World Cup, whose final ends two days before his own opening night. And the coach in him still runs the locker room. For the three core days of the annual convention, his entire staff gathers at 6:30 each morning to review yesterday’s developments and take today’s assignments. From the stage he tells two thousand attendees to put their phones down and close their laptops to fully engage and take in the limited time together, the producer protecting the audience’s attention long enough for the goosebumps to arrive.

The Season

Jean Welsh died last October. Forty-four years after the ticket counter at O’Hare, after a valiant eleven-year fight with breast cancer, after the twenty-plus family moves with his wife and four daughters Ashley, Laura, Amanda and Sarah, that Welsh admits were probably to excess and that the family would confirm. He mentions her early in our conversation, gently, the way men of his generation hand you the heaviest thing they are carrying while assuring you it is manageable.

During these personal and unsettled times, board chair Leslie Bruce the board asked him to extend his contract beyond the agreed term that was due to expire this year. They reached an agreement to extend one more year, through 2027, when he will be seventy-one and twelve years into the job. He figures that is sufficient time and the organization is in a great position for somebody else to come in, as he puts it with a grin, with a maybe less intense personality, and pick it up in 2028. He is staying through the end of next year. This is not a farewell lap, and he would bristle at the word retirement. Asked what comes after, he answers like a man planning an off-season, not an ending: the first quarter of 2028 doing really whatever the hell he wants, probably a month in a rented house in Hawaii, where he and Jean lived twice, because if he stays home in Sarasota the mind never stops. And then, he says flatly, I’m not going to be one of these people who stops.

But the season knows what it is. This October, Welsh will fly from Malta via Istanbul to Baltimore, halfway around the world for a single day, to stand with the surviving members of the Towson team that played for the national championship fifty years ago. A lot of my friends, he says, are starting to kick away. The coach who taught them all the mirror test is gone. The catcher who lost his eyes, the linebacker of average intelligence and inexhaustible effort, the baggage loader who married the flight attendant, the fixer who answered a blind ad and ended up rebuilding the oldest association in the gathering economy, will be in the room, again welcoming guests from around the world.

Somewhere in Baltimore there is still a mirror. He can look it in the eye.

Sourcing note: this profile is drawn from the author’s recorded interview with Don Welsh in July 2026. Biographical anchors, Calvert Hall, Towson’s Stagg Bowl appearance, the Horizon Airlines founding and 1986 sale to Alaska Airlines, the 2015 to 2016 DMAI financial crisis and leadership transition, and the DI membership expansion, are consistent with the public record. Details of Welsh’s family history, his contract timeline and the reunion travel are per Welsh’s own account, single-sourced to the interview, and subject to the pre-publication review he was promised.

Subscribe now

Ten Deposits from the Coach in Chief

Drawn from Don Welsh’s conversation with David Adler, July 2026. The view from altitude: what fifty years across airlines, hotels, casinos, three destination organizations and one global association teach about leadership, cities, and gathering.

Deposit No. 1: The Mirror Test The only performance review that counts is conducted alone, at night, with an audience of one. Welsh’s college coach, Phil Albert, never yelled after a loss, because the scoreboard was never the measurement; the question was whether you could look yourself in the eye afterward. Shy away from the mirror and you already have your answer, and Welsh has run every job by that test for fifty years.

Deposit No. 2: Effort Is a Strategy Welsh calls his own intelligence average and credits one sentence for every job he has won: “I’ll outwork you.” In industries built on relationships and reputation, effort compounds like interest, and the executive who visits two hundred members in person will always know more than the one reading two hundred reports.

Deposit No. 3: Know Whether You Are a Fixer, a Builder, or a Maintainer The most useful thing an executive can know is which stage of an organization they belong to. Welsh wants a company either building or broken and admits he is a poor maintenance man. Careers derail when fixers take maintenance jobs and maintainers inherit fires, so diagnose yourself first and choose the job to match.

Deposit No. 4: Before the Plan, the Apology Handed a broken institution, Welsh skipped the strategy deck and went to two hundred members with three questions: what do you want, what do you need, and what will you support? His staff called it the Apology Tour, and the third question is the one most leaders never ask, because it is the only one that turns applause into commitment.

Deposit No. 5: A Corporation Has a Balance Sheet. A Community Has a Soul. A corporation has no soul; a destination does, because its leaders are entrusted with the brand of an entire community, which Welsh calls the highest trust in the world. It took him years inside hotels and casinos to see that the two must be led differently, and every leader should know which of the two they have actually been handed.

Deposit No. 6: Retire Your Own Best Line In Chicago, Welsh measured success by gridlock: full hotels, packed restaurants, buses that could not move. He now calls that thinking backward, because a destination only succeeds when it models the shared values of its residents and not just its visitors, and the harder discipline is retiring the idea that once made you famous.

Deposit No. 7: The Alternative Mayor Gives the Credit Back The destination chief now lives on stage around the clock, often with a bigger profile than the elected officials next door. Welsh learned in Chicago that crediting the wins to him instead of the mayor who launched them did not fly, and power held in trust has to be visibly returned: hand the credit to the person whose city it is, and you get to keep the job.

Deposit No. 8: Every Place Is a Terroir Welsh leads more than 770 destinations on a single premise, that no two are alike. Each carries its own soil, story and self-image, like wines from neighboring hillsides, and the fatal error is selling places as interchangeable inventory, because the moment a city markets itself like every other city it has nothing left to sell.

Deposit No. 9: Don’t Hold Meetings. Produce Shows. People no longer assemble for information; they assemble for feeling. Welsh has Destinations International stage productions built on musical and visual themes and tells two thousand attendees to close the laptops and put the phones down, a right he earns the way a coach does: the whole team in the room at 6:30 every morning, doors locked on latecomers.

Deposit No. 10: Play the Season You Are In Welsh lost Jean, his wife of forty-four years, last October. He declined the board’s push to stay several more years and committed only through 2027, and this fall he will fly around the world for a single day to stand with his college team fifty years on; seasons are finite and unlike one another, and the only way to play one is all the way through.

Share

Subscribe now

Sourcing note: all deposits are drawn from David Adler’s recorded interview with Don Welsh, July 2026, and are single-sourced to that conversation. Biographical anchors are consistent with the public record; membership figures and timeline details are per Welsh and DI materials and subject to the pre-publication review he was promised.

Edible Profile of Don Welsh

At Towson, fifty years ago this fall, he played on the team that reached the national championship under a coach named Phil Albert, who never yelled after a loss. Albert’s reasoning gave this song its name. The scoreboard, he taught his players, is not the measurement; the measurement comes later, alone, when you face the man in the mirror. If you gave everything you had, you can look him directly in the eye. If you held something back, you will catch yourself shying away, and no final score can overrule that verdict. That is the mirror test, and Welsh has taken it every night for fifty years, through every job, every city, every season. Jean died last October after an eleven-year fight. This October, Welsh will fly from Malta through Istanbul to Baltimore for a single day, to stand with his old teammates one more time. He calls the year ahead his last season at Destinations International. Nobody who has met him believes he is capable of a last play. This song is for him, in the big melodic singalong style he would program himself, from a man who turns meetings into shows and tells two thousand people to put their phones down and feel something.

The Lyrics

Verse 1 Baltimore boy with his eyes on the sky, Watching the silver birds taxi on by, Loading the bags in the summertime heat, Dreaming of towns at the end of the street. His brother had passes, his mama had plans, Hawaii and Vegas in a young boy’s hands, And he looked out the window and quietly swore, I won’t be staying here anymore.

Chorus Look yourself in the eye, look yourself in the eye, If you gave all you had, then you know why. Win or lose, it’s the mirror test, The coach never asked for more, just asked your best, Look yourself in the eye.

Verse 2 Ticket counter at O’Hare, nineteen and green, That’s where the boy from Baltimore met Jean. Forty-four years and twenty-some moves, She flew beside him through the highs and the blues. Airlines and hotels and neon casinos, Seattle to Indy to windy Chicago, Every seat in the house, every job on the floor, The bag man was learning what wisdom was for.

Chorus Look yourself in the eye, look yourself in the eye, If you gave all you had, then you know why. Win or lose, it’s the mirror test, The coach never asked for more, just asked your best, Look yourself in the eye.

Bridge They called him in when the house was on fire, He went door to door like a choir for hire, Saying what do you want, what do you need, What will you stand behind? Now it’s Destinations International, seven hundred seventy strong, Every town like a wine with a soil of its own, No two the same, but they all sing along, When the coach turns the meetings to shows.

Verse 3 Now October’s coming and the old team calls, Fifty years gone since those championship falls, Don Welsh flies the world for a single day, ‘Cause the friends of a lifetime are starting to slip away. Jean’s up ahead where the islands are green, He’ll rent a little house where they both had been, And don’t you call it an ending, he’ll tell you with a grin, The season’s not over till the coach walks in.

Final Chorus Look yourself in the eye, look yourself in the eye, If you gave all you had, then you know why. Win or lose, it’s the mirror test, Don Welsh’s last long season, not his last play yet, And he’s looking that mirror in the eye.

An original composition for the GatheringPoint Wisdom Bank profile of Don Welsh, President and CEO of Destinations International. All story details are drawn from David

EDITOR’S NOTE: The freedom to gather — to put scientists, researchers, and funders in the same room — is under direct federal threat. The comment deadline for OMB-2026-0034 is tonight at 11:59 p.m. Eastern. Go to regulations.gov/docket/OMB-2026-0034 and make your voice heard before midnight.

Share

Subscribe now

The same administration that launched a billion-dollar initiative to make America the world leader in AI-driven scientific discovery has proposed a regulation that would bar the scientists doing that science from attending the conferences where discovery happens. It calls the initiative the Genesis Mission. It calls the regulation a reform of federal grant management. One of them is true.

July 13 is when we find out which one the government believes.

The regulation is called OMB-2026-0034. Co-signed by 40 federal agencies simultaneously, including the Department of Energy that runs the Genesis Mission’s 17 national laboratories and the National Science Foundation that funds the basic research driving American science, it proposes to prohibit federal grant recipients from attending conferences unless attendance was written into the original terms of their award. Not amended in later. Not approved after an abstract is accepted. Written in at the beginning, before the researcher knows which conference they will present at, before the abstract has been submitted, before the science itself has produced the finding that warrants a presentation. As of July 11, two days before the comment deadline, 107,555 people had filed formal objections on the federal docket. The American Association for Cancer Research called the proposal reckless. The American Physical Society called it an existential threat to U.S. science. The American Astronomical Society led a coalition of more than 50 scientific societies in opposition. ASAE, the American Society of Association Executives, which represents more than 7,400 organizations whose members run the medical and scientific meetings most directly in the crosshairs, is reviewing the rule and plans to submit comments before the deadline. The Exhibitions and Conferences Alliance, led by President and CEO Tommy Goodwin, filed a nine-page formal opposition on June 17, calling on OMB Director Russell Vought to withdraw both provisions in full. Michelle Mason, President and CEO of ASAE, put it plainly: "The associations that ASAE serves in the scientific and medical community don't just run meetings. They run the rooms where the next treatment, the next collaboration, the next grant relationship begins. A regulation that bars federally funded scientists from those rooms is not a grant management reform. It is a disruption to the core mission of every scientific society in America."

Most of the events industry has not noticed. That is the first problem. The second is larger.

The comment period closes tonight at midnight. As of July 11, 107,555 (almost 300,000 from the document below) people had filed objections, most of them scientists, researchers, university administrators, and scientific societies. A biology professor at Ball State described the rule as making it nearly impossible to plan long-term experiments and sustain support for trainees. An AGU board member filed a comment that named the conference provision directly: “Scientific communication, whether through professional meetings or peer-reviewed publications, is the only way to share scientific findings. An individual working alone, with no route to sharing their work, does no good to society. Ideas thrive when they are shared, tested and amended, all of which happens through publications and presentations. Restricting this avenue damages our nation and leaves us unable to compete.” Senator Susan Collins, a Republican, asked OMB Director Vought to extend the comment period by 90 days. FASEB representing more than 100,000 researchers across the biological and biomedical sciences, filed formal comments. AGU President Brandon Jones wrote that the rule restructures the foundational rules of U.S. science funding to serve political priorities rather than the public good. A small minority of comments support the rule on waste and fraud grounds. The events industry’s voice in the record is almost entirely absent. The comment portal closes at 11:59 p.m. Eastern tonight at regulations.gov, docket OMB-2026-0034.

The proposed rule is not a standalone conference policy. It is one provision inside a sweeping 400-page ideological reorganization of federal grantmaking whose preamble explicitly frames it as a response to what it calls a “woke policy agenda” from 2021 to 2024. The conference attendance restriction travels with a second provision, Section 200.340, that proposes to give political appointees discretion to terminate active grants if the award is deemed “no longer in the Federal Government’s interest.” A researcher whose grant is terminated midstream cannot attend the conference where she was presenting the work that grant was funding, because that conference was not written into the original award terms. The two provisions are not separate. They work together. And they take effect October 1, 2026, binding every federal agency simultaneously, with the force of law.

Gail Mutnik and I went to college together. We were both active in student government, which is where you learn, if you learn it anywhere, that the agenda is not the meeting. The meeting is what happens between the agenda items, in the arguments that break out before the vote, at the table where someone says something they would never have said in the formal session. Gail learned this at twenty. She spent the next fifty years applying it to rooms full of scientists trying to solve diseases, which turns out to be the same skill at a different scale and with considerably higher stakes.

I called her recently because I had a feeling that the world she had spent her career inside was being threatened in ways the broader events industry had not yet noticed or named. I was right.

What the Rooms Are Actually For

Scientific meetings, of which medical meetings are the largest and most thoroughly documented category, are not conferences in the sense the broader events industry uses that word. They are not content delivery mechanisms. They are not networking opportunities with keynotes attached. They are gatherings of people who are each carrying pieces of problems that have not yet been solved, assembled in the same physical space under enough structured pressure that the pieces have a chance of finding each other. The output is not a takeaway or a badge scan or a lead. The output is, sometimes, a cure.

Gail understood this from the inside before she could have articulated it from the outside. Six months out of college, a woman at the American Society of Public Administration spotted something in her. “You’re really detail-oriented,” the woman said, “and you know the field. I have an opening in my meetings department. I’d like to train you. But you have to promise me two years.” Gail was twenty-two. She said yes. Her mentor sent her to school at ASAE, the American Society of Association Executives. She joined MPI, helped start the DC chapter, and learned the rest from the people around her because there was no formal education for this yet. No George Washington program. No George Mason program. No CMP credential. Her hotel salesperson taught her. Her general service contractor taught her. A mentor in Atlanta named Jeff Millen taught her an enormous amount. She calls herself a journeyman, and she means it as a precise description rather than a modest one. There is a small group of people in medical and scientific meetings who are genuinely innovative, she told me, who can take their meetings to a different level because their budgets and imagination allow it. Then there are people like her, who take what the innovators do, apply it within their constraints, and manage their meetings with enough discipline that the science inside them can do what it came to do.

What both groups share is a clear-eyed understanding of what a scientific meeting is for. “The real value,” Gail told me, “is not necessarily the dots on the board, the equation and the formula. The real value is talking to the researcher. How did you come up with this idea? What was the problem you were trying to solve? Now what? You’ve done this research, now what’s the next step?” She monitors virtual sessions for ASH, the American Society of Hematology, every December as a logistics facilitator, making sure slides are visible and AV is working. What she keeps seeing is something the platform cannot manufacture. “I can’t tell you how many times when the panel finished speaking, somebody will say to the panelist, ‘Okay, so now you’ve done this. What’s your next step? I have some ideas. Can we talk after the session?’ That doesn’t happen virtually. That only happens in the room.”

The science behind that observation is now substantial and specific. Researchers who share a physical building are 33 percent more likely to form new collaborations than those who do not. Put them on the same floor and that number rises to 57 percent. A study published in Nature in 2023 found that remote research teams, for all their access to global knowledge, are systematically less likely to produce breakthroughs, because breakthroughs require integration: two minds in the same space, reading each other’s faces, building on a thought before it disappears. Duke University researchers studying the human brain at the moment of discovery found that when insight strikes, the hippocampus fires, neural circuits reorganize, and the strength of the epiphany nearly doubles the likelihood that the person acts on what they suddenly understood. The machine can give a researcher every piece of the puzzle. It cannot give them the moment the pieces resolve into a picture. That moment is biological. It requires a prepared mind, an unexpected encounter, and something that surprises it.

Medical and scientific meetings are the machine that manufactures those surprises, at scale, on purpose.

The Landscape and Its Margins

ASCO, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, drew 45,300 participants in 2024, with 14,400 from outside the United States. RSNA, the Radiological Society of North America, is what Gail called the big behemoth of the device world, where the imaging machines take up so much exhibit hall space that the meeting can only realistically be held in Chicago or Orlando. “They could meet in Vegas,” she told me, “but Vegas doesn’t like that scientific and medical meetings are usually scheduled for the weekends and conflict with consumer demand.” ASH brings over 30,000 clinicians and researchers to its annual meeting in December, taking over all of downtown San Diego when it meets there, spilling into the ballpark. The American Heart Association draws nearly 13,000 professionals from more than 100 countries in person, with two million more participating virtually. These are not simply large events. They are, in the specific context of what proximity does to scientific knowledge, large experiments in what happens when you compress the right minds into the same space for four days and give them enough unstructured time to surprise each other.

What once made this landscape categorically different from the broader events industry was a strict church-and-state framework: science on one side, commerce on the other, an accreditation wall between them. CME credits, the continuing medical education that physicians, nurses, lab technicians, and researchers need to maintain their credentials, cannot be earned at a commercially tainted event. That wall has shaped everything about how medical and scientific meetings are designed and sold. The reception dinner Beckman Coulter hosted at the ADLM meeting was, in Gail’s telling, the get invitation of the conference year. If you got invited to the Beckman Coulter reception, you were somebody. The commercial side of the ecosystem honoring the scientific side, at a safe and regulated distance.

But the wall is becoming a door. Ken Holsinger, SVP Industry Research and Insight at Freeman and one of the most rigorous analysts of the scientific meeting market, says the data is now clear. CME claims have been dropping for several years but accelerated steeply post-pandemic when numerous alternative options became available. “It’s not affecting their attendance,” Holsinger says. “Their numbers are stable and for many, are up.” The implication is significant. Physicians and researchers are not coming for credits anymore. They are coming because the room is where the science moves. And Holsinger’s research shows that 83 percent of attendees across the meetings landscape, including scientific meetings, say they would prefer to get their learning from subject matter experts including industry sponsors, if there is transparency. The church-and-state model was built for a world where the primary reason to attend was CME accreditation. That world is gone. What replaced it is something more elemental and more powerful: people coming because they cannot get what they need anywhere else.

The financial architecture underneath all of it is what makes the current threat so dangerous. When Gail ran the meetings department at AACC, now rebranded as ADLM, the Association for Diagnostics and Laboratory Medicine, her meetings budget was 65 percent of the association’s entire operating budget and 100 percent of its profit. “I can’t tell you how many times the controller would come into my office and say, ‘If we don’t make budget, or we don’t exceed budget, I’m going to have to let people go.’” She is not describing a contribution to revenue. She is describing the engine that keeps the association alive, which means the engine that keeps the scientific community the association serves in business. A 10 percent attendance drop is not a rounding error at those margins. It is an existential event. This dependence on the revenue from annual scientific meetings is not unusual.

The federal government constituency inside these meetings is not the majority. Gail estimated it at 10 to 12 percent, depending on the association. But she named its specific function. “If you want a grant from the government, which many people need to do their research, if the NIH people aren’t at the meeting, you can’t get to know them. You can’t make your pitch. Even before you make your pitch on paper, even before you apply for the grant, if I know you, you might be looking more favorably on my application because you know who I am.” The NIH program officer who attends the ASH meeting every December is not just an attendee. She is the connective tissue between the science being presented and the money that funds the next round of it. Remove her from the room and you do not lose 10 percent of attendance. You break the chain.

How the Unraveling Began

On January 22, 2025, employees at the National Institutes of Health were informed that all travel, foreign and domestic, had been suspended immediately and indefinitely. Researchers were told they would need official permission to attend conferences even if they covered their own expenses. The ban was communicated verbally, by managers, without written policy guidance. A senior NIH scientist described to Science magazine the group of early-career researchers who had been scheduled to present at a conference the following week, presentations now impossible. “I have never seen this level of confusion and concern in people that are extremely dedicated to their mission.”

The Biophysical Society held its annual meeting in February 2025. Twenty-nine speakers canceled. Sessions designed to help researchers navigate grant applications from NSF and NIH were dropped entirely because the NIH scientists who were supposed to run them could not come. The ban was formally reversed on April 10, 2025. The damage did not reverse with it. The approval requirement remained. The uncertainty remained. The institutional memory of what had happened shaped every travel decision made in the months that followed.

What the January ban did informally, OMB-2026-0034 would do in permanent federal regulation. The proposed rule is co-signed by 40 federal agencies, including the Department of Energy, which runs the 17 national laboratories at the center of the Genesis Mission, and the National Science Foundation, which funds the basic scientific research that drives the meetings the rule would restrict. It goes further than the travel ban did. The American Physical Society noted that under the proposed rule, professional society membership costs would also require prior written approval and would be banned entirely if the organization is deemed to engage in issue advocacy. Every major scientific society has advocacy arms. The New York Times, Scientific American, the New England Journal of Medicine, the Atlantic, the Financial Times, and STAT News have all reported on the rule in the past month. The broader events industry has produced almost nothing.

The Contradiction at the Heart of It

On November 24, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order launching what his administration called the Genesis Mission, describing it as this generation’s Manhattan Project. The stated goal was to double U.S. scientific productivity in ten years using artificial intelligence. The order directed the Department of Energy to unite 17 national laboratories, 40,000 scientists and engineers, and the nation’s most powerful supercomputers into a single integrated platform for AI-driven discovery. Google DeepMind signed a memorandum of understanding with DOE. NVIDIA partnered as a private-sector collaborator. $293 million in federal funding was announced in March 2026 to support what the administration called 26 national science and technology challenges. In May, the White House Chief Technology Officer told an audience at the Special Competitive Studies Project’s AI Expo that agentic AI, autonomous systems capable of executing tasks with minimal human oversight, would have a profound impact on scientific research.

The rhetoric of American scientific dominance has been consistent and loud. The problem is not the ambition. The problem is what the administration is doing simultaneously to the human infrastructure that gives AI something to work with.

AlphaFold is perhaps the most celebrated AI achievement in the life sciences of the past decade. It predicted the three-dimensional structure of two hundred million proteins, a task that would have taken human researchers centuries using conventional methods. The system is genuinely revolutionary. But AlphaFold was built by a team at DeepMind that spent years in dialogue with the structural biology community, presenting at conferences, absorbing feedback from researchers who had devoted careers to specific protein families, iterating on findings that emerged from the kind of cross-disciplinary collision that happens when the right scientists are in the same room. The AI did not produce the breakthrough in isolation. It produced it in partnership with a global scientific community that had been convening, arguing, and building on each other’s work for decades in exactly the kinds of meetings that OMB-2026-0034 would make structurally inaccessible to federally funded researchers. Remove the community and you do not get a faster version of discovery. You get a very powerful tool with no one left who knows how to ask it the right questions.

The neuroscience is specific here. When insight strikes the human brain, the hippocampus fires. Neural circuits reorganize. The stronger the epiphany, the deeper the memory, the greater the commitment to pursue what just crystallized. That moment cannot be programmed. It cannot be scheduled. It cannot be produced by a closed-loop AI experimentation platform or a national supercomputing cluster, regardless of how much compute is available. It requires a prepared mind encountering something unexpected. And the most reliable machine ever built for manufacturing those encounters is a well-designed scientific meeting where 30,000 researchers have been put in the same city for four days with enough unstructured time to collide with each other.

The Genesis Mission is betting that AI can accelerate scientific discovery. The science of human cognition says that bet only pays off if the scientists doing the discovering are still in the same rooms together, still presenting their findings to each other, still having the hallway argument that produces the idea neither of them would have had alone. The administration launched a billion-dollar initiative to speed up science and simultaneously proposed a regulation, co-signed by the very agency running that initiative, that would bar the scientists doing that science from attending the conferences where the human half of the acceleration happens. That is not a policy tension. It is a self-defeating contradiction written into federal regulation, with an October 1 implementation date.

The Regulation Nobody in Events Is Discussing

Section 200.432, as proposed, would replace a workable framework with what the ECA called an unworkable prior-approval requirement. The current rule already requires that conference attendance be necessary and reasonable for successful performance under a federal award. The new rule would require that attendance be expressly approved by the federal agency and written into the original award terms before any conference cost is allowable. A researcher may not know whether an abstract will be accepted until months or even years after the award terms are finalized. A project team may learn about a relevant technical convening after the award begins. Under the proposed rule, none of those circumstances would constitute a basis for allowable conference attendance unless the specific conference had been named at the time the grant was signed.

The equity consequence compounds the damage. Larger and better-funded institutions will still attend, drawing on unrestricted funds that do not touch the federal award. Smaller organizations, early-career researchers, rural institutions, minority-serving institutions, and community colleges will not. The AACR noted that the proposed changes may adversely affect patient accrual to cancer clinical trials, since patients may be less likely to enroll if ongoing support for trials is uncertain. A separate analysis published in Scientific American found the rule could kill 5,000 active clinical trials. Cancer research requires years of sustained investment. Permitting political appointees to discontinue a grant or clinical trial after it has already begun destabilizes research programs that patients are relying on for their survival.

The second provision, Section 200.219, reaches into venue management decisions involving access to facilities, security, crowd management, insurance, and fees, applying federal grant conditions to operational decisions that require local knowledge and professional judgment. Its political backstory is specific: OMB designed it to stop public universities from charging higher security fees for conservative speakers. Its practical scope is anything but specific. It would apply to any public entity receiving federal funds, covering events on their property regardless of whether those events are federally funded. A venue facing a potential grant-compliance complaint may hesitate before implementing safety measures that are genuinely warranted. Decisions requiring trained professionals who understand the specific facility and the specific event should not be made by federal grant administrators applying unclear national standards after the fact.

Together the two provisions represent something the broader events industry has not absorbed. This is not a medical and scientific meetings problem. It is a federal grant problem that affects every organization whose conference attendance is funded by a federal award in any field. University research programs. Workforce development meetings. Public health conferences. Engineering and technology societies. All of them send grant recipients to conferences. All of them face the same prior-approval requirement if Section 200.432 passes as written. October 1 is when it has the force of law.

Three Centuries of Rooms

The medical and scientific meeting as an institution is nearly three hundred years old. In 1731, a Scottish surgeon named Alexander Monro Primus gathered physicians in Edinburgh, not to lecture them but to argue with each other. He called it the Society for the Improvement of Medical Knowledge. They met regularly, presented cases, disputed findings, and published what they decided. It became the first peer-reviewed medical journal in Britain. From those rooms, across two generations of argument, came the students who built North American medical education, the men who proved the germ theory of infection, the physicians who identified diseases that now carry their names. The form of the meeting has changed almost beyond recognition. The underlying logic has not moved.

The most analog technology in all of scientific meetings is the poster session, and it is also where the most important science happens. At ASH in December, researchers physically carry their posters from around the world. Holsinger describes watching them board planes carrying what looks like a fishing pole tube, protecting it like state secrets, because it is their life’s work on a board. He tells the story of a young researcher from Kenya, coming to San Diego to present her sickle cell research, nearly in tears when the airline tried to check her poster because there was no room in coach. He brought it to first class with him and connected with her on the show floor. At that same meeting last year, researchers found what may be a pathway to the cure for sickle cell disease. It did not happen in a session room. It happened in the hall.

The ASH poster hall at peak hours has logged thousands of people simultaneously. Numerous large meetings turn down millions of dollars in exhibitor floor revenue every year to protect the space the poster hall requires, because their leadership understands that the poster hall is not ancillary to the meeting. It is the meeting. Several groups have built digital poster platforms to test whether the format could move online. But they can only handle roughly a hundred posters before they become unnavigable. ASH runs numerous rotations of physical posters across four days. The math tells you everything. Some things do not scale digitally because their value is in the physical density, the serendipity of two researchers stopping at adjacent boards and discovering that their separate work is one problem. “Everything you describe about the magic of serendipity,” Holsinger told me, “that’s where it happens.”

The researcher who cannot attend because her grant does not include this conference in the original award terms will not find that collision in an app.

What Gail has understood, across five decades of building those rooms, is that the science is only half of what happens inside them. The other half is the social architecture of discovery. The poster session that puts two researchers in front of the same board. The exhibit floor dinner that introduces a lab director to the diagnostics company that has the tool she has been searching for. The gap between sessions where someone says “wait, what did you just say?” and the conversation that follows changes the direction of a research program. “You can’t replace looking somebody in the eye and saying, ‘I challenge your assumption, and here’s why I challenge your assumption,’” she told me. “Or, ‘I agree with your assumption, but did you think about blank?’ That doesn’t happen virtually. That only happens in the room.”

The attendees who come to these meetings are not there for goosebumps in the sense the broader events world uses that word. They are not there for CME credits anymore either. Mostly they come for what Gail described more precisely: to be seen and see, to present their science if they want to be taken seriously, to show they are serious about their work if they are young and want to rise. They are unforgiving of anything that gets between them and that purpose. “If you do something as an organizer that is ridiculous, if you have a balloon arch in the exhibit hall,” she said, the image visibly impatient in the telling, “they look at you and they’re like, ‘What the hell was that? Don’t impede my progress into the hall by making me walk through a balloon arch.’ Where in other meetings, that kind of frills is accepted and expected.” They are dealing with life and death. The urgency in those rooms is not metaphorical, and it does not tolerate decoration.

The Industry That Forgot Where It Came From

PCMA, the Professional Convention Management Association, was originally founded in significant part to serve the medical and scientific meeting community. It drifted. A group of scientific and medical meeting professionals, several of them past PCMA presidents, eventually went to the CEO and said there was nothing at PCMA for the scientific meeting planner at any level, and that the organization could not continue to ignore a category it had been built to serve. They were given a one-day track that they had to staff themselves. “It was like, ‘Yeah, okay, fine, we’ll give it to you,’” Gail said, “because two of the people who went to him are past presidents of PCMA. So he couldn’t ignore it.” In his most recent quarterly report, the CEO wrote several paragraphs about needing to return to the organization’s scientific meeting roots. It took past presidents walking into the office to make him write those paragraphs.

ASAE, the organization where Gail received her first formal training and where she has spent her career, represents more than 7,400 organizations whose combined membership runs the full spectrum of medical and scientific meetings. Through its Power of A advocacy platform, ASAE has been tracking the rule and preparing to file formal comments before the July 13 deadline. What that filing says, and how forcefully it says it, will be one measure of whether the association management world has finally understood what is at stake in the rooms its members have been building for three centuries.

On the exhibition and events side, Tommy Goodwin, President and CEO of the Exhibitions and Conferences Alliance, has been the most visible industry voice in the formal regulatory process. The ECA, whose members include the organizers, exhibitors, suppliers, venues, and small businesses that build and operate the rooms where scientific meetings happen, filed nine pages of documented legal opposition to OMB Director Russell Vought on June 17. The letter was precise, specific, and unambiguous: withdraw both provisions in full. Goodwin’s organization represents an industry that employs 2.6 million Americans and drives more than $400 billion in domestic spending annually. That is the industry whose rooms are directly in the crosshairs, and it is the industry that has been most conspicuously absent from the broader public mobilization the scientific community has mounted.

The broader industry has been producing gatherings for decades without asking what the one category of meeting with a scientifically documented proof of value actually knows. The research is not obscure. It is published, peer-reviewed, and available to anyone who looks. Scientific meetings produce collaborations, grant applications, clinical trial partnerships, and treatments that would not exist otherwise. The hallway conversation is not a side effect of the conference. The poster session is not a relic waiting to be digitized. They are the mechanisms of discovery. Gail Mutnik has spent her career designing the conditions that make those conversations possible, managing the logistics that support the science, putting the right 21,000 people in the same building for five days, and staying out of the way when the collisions she designed begin to happen.

What Comes Next

“I don’t want to say we’re in a crisis today,” Gail told me near the end of our conversation. “But we’re certainly heading in that direction. And depending upon how much more HHS does or doesn’t allow, we could be in a crisis. Especially for a smaller association.” NIH cutting back on grants and travel. Hospitals closing. Research programs dependent on federal funding finding the funding gone, and unable to replace it with pharmaceutical money because the compliance rules prevent it. “If your shop only runs on federal grants,” she said, “there’s no reason for you to come if the feds can’t be there.”

What has happened in the 45 days since OMB published the proposed rule is, by the standards of federal rulemaking, extraordinary. The AACR mobilized 66,000 members with a formal call to action. The American Physical Society joined more than two dozen scientific organizations in calling the rule an existential threat. The American Astronomical Society(https://aas.org) led a coalition of more than 50 scientific societies in a letter to Congress. The New England Journal of Medicine published an opinion piece. STAT ran one from a researcher with 40 years in the field who described this as the worst threat to science he had ever seen. The Atlantic, the Financial Times, Nature, and the New York Times have all weighed in. Scientific American reported that an independent analysis found the rule could kill 5,000 active clinical trials. As of July 11, 107,555 public comments had been filed on the federal docket.

Under the Administrative Procedure Act, OMB is legally required to respond to every significant comment before finalizing the rule. A large volume of substantive, specific, individually written comments builds a record courts can review if the rule is challenged legally, forces OMB to defend each provision individually, and signals to Congress that the rule is contested enough to warrant a legislative response. The administration has indicated it intends to finalize the rule with an October 1 effective date. Legal challenges are expected regardless. The comment record determines how strong those challenges are.

The events industry’s voice in that record, as of this writing, is thin. Tommy Goodwin and the Exhibitions and Conferences Alliance filed their nine pages of opposition on June 17. ASAE is preparing to file through its Power of A advocacy platform before midnight tonight. Beyond those two organizations, the broader gathering world, the one that builds and operates the rooms where the science happens, is still largely watching from the outside.

That may be the most important data point in this story.

The Genesis Mission wants to double American scientific productivity in a decade using AI. That goal requires a scientific community that is still intact, still connected, still meeting in the same rooms, still having the collisions that give the AI something meaningful to accelerate. You cannot run a billion-dollar machine-driven discovery program if you have defunded and isolated the human scientists who feed it. The two policies cannot coexist. One of them will determine whether the other succeeds.

The rooms Alexander Monro Primus built in Edinburgh in 1731 survived two centuries of confident predictions that the meeting was no longer necessary. They survived because the people who understood what happened inside them refused to let the argument for their value go unmade.

Gail Mutnik and I both learned something about rooms in student government. What she learned was the same thing Monro Primus learned in 1731, and the same thing Ken Holsinger has spent a decade watching happen on the floors of the world’s largest scientific gatherings: the agenda is not the meeting. The meeting is what happens when the right people are in the room together, with enough time to find each other, and nothing in the way.

July 13 is the next moment when that argument needs to be made.

Take Action Through the ECA Advocacy Network

The Exhibitions and Conferences Alliance has made it simple to submit a formal comment before tonight’s midnight deadline. Visit the ECA Advocacy Network Action Center, select “Stop harmful OMB grant proposal,” enter your contact information, tailor the letter to your organization and role in the industry, and click Submit. That is all it takes. The comment period closes at 11:59 p.m. Eastern tonight.

Comments on OMB-2026-0034 can be submitted at regulations.gov, docket OMB-2026-0034, through July 13 at 11:59 p.m. ET. OMB named contacts for the rulemaking are Andrew Reisig and Joel Savary at MBX.OMB.Grants@OMB.eop.gov. GatheringPoint has requested comment.

The first thing you notice about Colja Dams is the smile. It arrives before the sentence does and stays after the sentence ends, which is not charm exactly but something closer to a philosophical position made visible. This is a man who spent his teenage years performing magic shows in German children’s hospitals, working for the attention of kids who had every reason not to give it to him, and the experience left a mark that fifty years of running a global agency has not touched. He learned something in those wards that no management school has ever figured out how to teach. He has been applying it at increasing scale ever since.

The agency he runs, VOK DAMS, does something that sounds straightforward until you look at it closely. It produces events for the world’s largest brands: the product launches, the leadership summits, the dealer conferences, the global roadshows, the intimate client dinners that close the deals the splashier events only set up. Founded in Wuppertal, Germany, in the early 1960s by his father Volkwart, the agency now operates 19 offices across three continents with 300 professionals serving clients including BMW, Bayer, Bugatti, Deutsche Telekom, Lamborghini, L’Oréal, Porsche, and SAP. What separates VOK DAMS from the crowded field of agencies that make similar claims is a structural fact that has become more valuable as the world has fragmented: genuine local expertise in North America, Europe, and Asia simultaneously, not a headquarters-and-partners model but actual offices with actual teams who know the room they are working in. For any multinational brand that needs its events to land the same way in Shanghai, Stuttgart, and São Paulo on the same calendar, this is not a nice-to-have. It is the thing.

Colja took the leadership in 1998, formally succeeded his father in 2007, and has spent nearly three decades deepening a business built on a principle he learned before he had language for it: that the gathering of people in a room around a shared experience is the most valuable thing a human being can engineer. The spectacular and the intimate are, for him, the same philosophy applied at different scales. He built a business around both. He will tell you without hesitation which one is growing faster.

The Slide Duster

Volkwart Dams described himself as a practitioner of direct communication with defined target groups, which Colja dutifully repeated to his schoolmates at a time when other children had parents who were firemen, police officers, people whose professions resolved into a single word. It did not go over well. What it gave him instead was a childhood spent inside the machinery of gatherings before he had vocabulary for what a gathering was, or why it mattered, or what distinguished one that worked from one that did not.

Volkwart, in partnership with Kodak, had developed a multi-projector system called Soft Edge in the late 1970s that allowed composite images at a scale with no equivalent outside of Hollywood film production. The choices at the time were a 35-millimeter production that took months and cost fortunes, or a Kodak slide system from Wuppertal that could fill a convention hall with something that looked like cinema. Conventions hired the Dams family. Trade shows hired the Dams family. And Colja, as a child, went along to dust the slides with a compressed-air gun, keeping the sequence with care, because the sequence mattered, because even at age ten there was something at stake in whether the image appeared correctly or not. By twelve he was attending trade shows. By sixteen, he was performing magic.

The civil service requirement in Germany offered a choice between military service and community work, and Colja spent his service hours in children’s hospitals with a deck of cards and seventeen minutes of material. What he found there was that an audience which is frightened, which is suffering, which has every rational reason to withhold its attention, will nonetheless give it to you if you earn it correctly. He learned how attention moves through a room. He learned what holds a crowd and what loses it, and why the transfer that happens between a performer and an audience is not illusion but something genuinely given and received. His father was, at one point, shocked to discover that his teenage son was being paid surprisingly well for those seventeen minutes. The money was beside the point. What Colja had understood, before he was old enough to vote, was that the gathering of people around a shared experience was the most valuable thing a human being can engineer. Everything since has been a question of scale.

Tarpon Springs

When Colja was seventeen, Volkwart made a decision shaped by a private regret. He was a war-generation German, a man denied the chance to learn English as a boy because the war had taken the schooling with it. He was not going to allow his children to carry the same limitation. He paid for Colja to spend a year at a high school in the Tampa Bay area, specifically in Tarpon Springs, Florida, a city on the Gulf Coast known for its Greek sponge-diving community and not, as Colja quickly established, particularly inclined to employ German exchange students through official channels. There was one establishment willing to take the chance: a Chinese restaurant called Sun Yen, which hired him as a weekend busboy on an arrangement that neither party examined too closely.

He learned his English. He also learned what he now calls China speed: the efficiency and the positive agenda and the absolute commitment to both the quality of the food and the level of the service, the particular quality of people who had built something from nothing and made every aspect of the work excellent, every day, without drama. Decades later he still stops in when he passes through Tampa, and he still gets a free dinner. Twenty-two years after he first walked into that kitchen, VOK DAMS opened its first office in Beijing. The agency now has four offices in China, with a fifth in Shenzhen opened in May 2026. He traces the line directly and without sentimentality. The busboy from Wuppertal built the agency that now serves the technology brands defining the next era of the global economy.

His brother, two years younger, had a different education. Where Colja went to Florida, the brother went to Bordeaux to learn French, fulfilling the same paternal argument that the sons of Volkwart Dams would not be limited by language. The brother studied in Bordeaux and never came back. He built his life there. The Dams family is now, without having planned it, distributed across three of the geographic zones that Colja has made the structural case for in every client conversation he has had for the last decade. He tells this story with the same smile that opens every subject, entirely aware of what it means.

The Global Bet

The decision to go global was not obvious, not cheap, and not without argument. VOK DAMS had spent forty years building its reputation inside the German-speaking corporate market, serving the kinds of industrial brands, automotive companies, pharmaceutical giants, and financial institutions that form the backbone of the Mittelstand and the DAX. Going to Beijing in 2004 was not a logical extension of that model. It was a bet, made by a man who had been running the business for six years and had not yet formally taken the reins from his father, that the fragmentation of the global economy into distinct geographic zones was not a temporary condition but a structural reality that his clients would eventually be forced to confront.

The clients who sent their product launches to three continents needed an agency that could execute with genuine local expertise in all three, not a German agency with a list of foreign contacts. He went to Beijing in 2004. Shanghai followed in 2009. The Shenzhen office opened in May 2026, positioned explicitly as a tech hub serving clients in the orbit of Huawei, Tencent, DJI, and the automotive companies whose next chapter is being written in southern China’s Greater Bay Area. When the Shenzhen opening was announced, Colja put it plainly: “Shenzhen is not just another city in China. It is the engine room of the country’s tech revolution. By opening an office here, VOK DAMS is making a clear commitment to being where the future is being built.” The world has since organized itself into exactly the three zones he bet on: North America, Europe, and Asia, each increasingly self-contained, each requiring genuine local fluency rather than remote coordination. He called it early. He built for it while others were still debating whether it was real.

In a world increasingly mediated by algorithms and synthetic connection, the unmediated moment is more valuable than ever. We are already living in a simulation, but the room where people are actually present together is the last thing that cannot be faked or automated. Watch how global event agency VOK DAMS engineers real human connection, proving that the live, face-to-face experience is the one thing AI cannot replicate

Claudia

Colja returned from Florida, studied at Universität Witten/Herdecke, a private reform university just down the road from Wuppertal founded on the conviction that interdisciplinary thinking and entrepreneurial instinct mattered more than conventional academic formation, and joined the agency in 1998 as its youngest member. He made a decision on the first day that has not changed since. He was not there to tell people how to do their jobs. He was there to make it possible for people to do their jobs without anyone telling them how, which is a different thing entirely. The philosophy he developed in those early months he named decentralized context management, and the phrase has not changed in twenty-seven years: the person standing in front of the customer must have the authority to make the decision in real time, because the moment they refer back up the chain, the customer experience has already degraded. He learned this in Tarpon Springs, where a language barrier and a teenage busboy’s initiative were the entire customer-facing operation.

Running a 300-person agency across 19 offices on three continents is not something one person does, and Colja names his wife before he names anything else. Claudia Köhler-Dams is co-CEO of VOK DAMS, sharing the leadership in a structure that is rare at this scale in any industry and rarer still in the event world. The division between them is both practical and clear. Colja focuses on new trends, forward movement, and the next opportunity. Claudia manages the operational reality that would otherwise consume everything, and she also manages Colja himself, which is a more demanding assignment. Before certain meetings he receives a text or an email telling him what not to chase that day, which directions to leave alone because the agency already has enough on its plate. There is no shortage of opportunities in the world Colja inhabits. There is a perpetual shortage of focus. Claudia supplies the focus, and he is openly, specifically grateful for it.

She also enforces something more important than operational discipline: the expectation that people at every level will say directly what they think, including to the people running the organization. There is an internal principle at VOK DAMS that if someone does something because Claudia or Colja said to do it, rather than because they believe in it themselves, they are not supposed to do it. The logic is not contrarian. It is motivational: people perform from autonomy, from competence, from belonging, not from being told what to do by someone above them on a chart. A former VOK DAMS project manager sent Colja a message recently saying they had more decision-making authority at the agency as a project manager than they now have as a managing director at a competitor. He found this deeply satisfying, not because it was flattering, but because it meant the philosophy was working the way he intended it to work twenty-seven years ago.

Almost half of VOK DAMS’s current clients are former employees, people who left the agency, took senior positions at major brands, and then hired the people they used to work for. They know exactly how the sausage is made. They choose to call Wuppertal anyway. That is not a marketing claim. It is a measurement of culture, and it is the measurement Colja trusts above any other.

Rituals

The rituals that hold 300 people together across 19 time zones are not elaborate, and Colja does not believe they need to be. Every Monday morning, every office in the world dials into a single meeting that is open to everyone. Teams present their projects, flag their active RFPs, and ask questions into the group. Someone from one office needs a specialist in southern France for an upcoming project. Someone from another office happens to know one. This exchange happens every week, across every time zone the agency occupies, and it is the connective tissue that keeps a global organization from becoming a collection of independent outposts.

At the Wuppertal headquarters, Colja recently invited the entire staff for ice cream in honor of his birthday, which falls on June 17 and is now known to the organization. The annual gathering, the internal event VOK DAMS throws for itself, is organized by the most successful office of the year: that office hosts the others, and it is the junior members of the hosting team who build the entire program. This December it is Hamburg, and the junior Hamburg team has already delivered presentations that Colja describes as impressive, for a program that runs a full day of learning followed by what he calls, with evident pleasure, a wild party at night. He and Claudia review the program. They almost always say yes. The point is not approval. The point is that the people closest to the work design the experience for everyone else, which is the same logic he has been running since 1998 and the same logic he applies to every client event the agency produces.

He has four children. The eldest, Corvin, is studying Business Economics and Marketing in Vancouver and is already stepping into the industry, joining his father at conferences and learning the business the same way his father learned it: by being in the room before you have the language for what you are seeing. Corvin will join Colja on stage at the upcoming Cvent conference in Nashville. His second son, Vic, is doing his internship in Singapore, deepening the family's connection to the Asian zone his father bet on two decades ago. His two daughters are still at school in Wuppertal, where the whole story began. The man who runs one of the most globally consequential event agencies in the world is texting his kids about matcha tea from Shenzhen. This, too, is a ritual, and he would not have it any other way.

PMA

There is a concept that motivational coaches and sales trainers have been using since the 1950s called positive mental attitude, the deliberate choice to approach circumstances from a position of opportunity rather than threat. It sounds like the kind of thing that gets printed on a poster and ignored. Colja Dams, when he first heard the abbreviation PMA, had not encountered it before. When it was explained, he absorbed it immediately and said he had literally written a LinkedIn post in German that same week about what he called the German angst: the national disposition toward pessimism and catastrophizing, the cultural default that treats every open door as a potential trap and every opportunity as a risk to be managed rather than a momentum to be seized. His counterargument is not naive optimism. He reads the same newspapers everyone reads. He is fully aware that the world is complicated. What he chooses, deliberately and as a management philosophy, is to focus on the opportunities rather than the shortfalls. In a country where the ambient cultural mood trends toward fear, choosing to operate from a position of positive momentum is, he argues, a genuine competitive advantage.

He learned this from his father, who built an agency from a photography studio in Wuppertal at a time when there was no industry, no trade association, no agreed-upon vocabulary for what he was doing, and who managed to do it with a disposition of forward motion rather than institutional caution. Colja inherited the disposition along with the business. The smile that opens every conversation is not a sales technique. It is the outward sign of a man who decided, at some point early enough that he no longer remembers deciding it, that the world contains more opportunity than threat, and that the correct response to a complicated morning is to focus on what is possible by evening.

The Goosebump Business

Colja’s current argument about where the industry is going is counterintuitive enough to stop a room, which is probably why he leads with it in conference keynotes. Artificial intelligence, he says, will drive more live events, not fewer. The mechanism is simple and structural. There are only three categories of things, in an AI world, that people and corporations will pay for: easing someone’s pain, providing convenience, and delivering experiences. The first two are being automated at speed. The third, the gathering of people in a room where something real can happen between them, is the category AI cannot replicate and will not replace. The more the world is mediated by algorithms and synthetic connection, the more the unmediated moment is worth.

He has a term for the current cultural condition that arrived to him mid-conversation and became the title of his next trend presentation on the spot: we are already living in a simulation. Everything is increasingly simulated. The only thing left that is genuinely not simulated is the room where people are actually present together, where what happens between them is not generated or approximated or optimized by a model. That room is what VOK DAMS sells, and Colja is not modest about the timing. The industry he has been building toward for twenty-seven years has arrived at a moment when its central product, the live human experience, is the one thing the most powerful technology in the world cannot produce. He finds this satisfying in the specific way that a person finds satisfaction when a long bet pays out.

He also has a specific and unflattering observation about what has happened to conferences, which is that hyper-personalization has become its own form of cognitive punishment. Nobody wants to open an app with seventeen tracks and five thousand sessions and navigate it while also trying to have a meaningful conversation with the person standing next to them. Nobody wants to trust an algorithm to curate their three days in a convention hall. What brand-owned events can offer that large-scale public conferences increasingly cannot is editorial judgment: the willingness to reduce the program to what the audience actually needs, to cut the white-paper content and the Teams-call material that has no business occupying a stage, and to give people the one thing they actually came for. By the end of the day, as Colja puts it with the plainness of someone who has been thinking about this since the beginning, why do people attend events? To meet other people. Not because of the brand that invited them, or the venue, or the food. The agenda of the person in the seat has almost nothing to do with the agenda of the person who built the stage, and the events that close that gap are the ones that work.

He also notes that the behavior of the people in those seats varies considerably depending on where in the world the event happens. Americans arrive energized, ready for a morning program, open to strangers in a way that requires no warming-up period. Germans need more time. The cultural disposition toward reserve means that a morning session that generates immediate energy in New York will feel flat in Munich until the room has had a chance to settle into itself. Asian networking protocols follow different rhythms entirely, and an event design that ignores this will not land the same way it landed in Chicago. VOK DAMS’s nineteen offices are not a growth strategy. They are a product quality argument. Local expertise is not a courtesy. It is the thing that makes the difference between an event that works and one that merely happens.

The Two Hundred Events

The fastest-growing part of the VOK DAMS business is not the landmark events, though the agency produces those at the highest level the industry can offer. The Bugatti Tourbillon reveal at the Château Saint Jean in Molsheim, staged as a dance-theater production for 2,000 guests marking both the brand’s 115th anniversary and the debut of a new era. The BMW Vision iNEXT World Flight, which placed a concept car inside a Lufthansa cargo plane and took it across Munich, New York, San Francisco, and Beijing in five days. The Lamborghini launch that closed Miami airport. These events define what VOK DAMS can do at the extreme edge of ambition and execution. They are not where the growth is.

The growth is in what Colja calls implant business: embedding VOK DAMS event managers directly inside client organizations to run the day-to-day portfolios that every multinational corporation produces continuously and almost never thinks of as a coherent strategy. Every corporation has two lighthouse events that command all the management attention, the RFPs, the agency pitches, the board-level scrutiny. Those same corporations may have two hundred other events running throughout the year. The combined budget of the two hundred events exceeds the two that get the credit. The sales leverage they generate, when run with consistent brand standards and genuine skill, exceeds it further. The attendee at a regional briefing in Düsseldorf has the same brand experience as the attendee at the annual summit in Zurich. The client who might have a mediocre Tuesday afternoon meeting that contradicts the excellence of their flagship event in January no longer has that problem. Colja says, without qualification, that this is the fastest-growing part of his operation. American companies in particular are coming to VOK DAMS and asking the agency to take over their entire global event portfolios.

Clients, he adds, regularly ask whether VOK DAMS can extend into adjacent functions once they see the quality of the event work up close. He keeps redirecting them. He knows what the core is, and he knows that the moment an agency stops knowing what its core is, it stops being good at anything.

Roughly a third to half of the agency’s business now comes not through RFPs but through long-term partnerships where clients are not buying a project but engaging a partner for two, four, or six years at a time. This is also what the Digital Doppelgänger makes possible at scale. The tool, which VOK DAMS developed initially by accident and then spent two years building into a formal capability with a dedicated team, creates an AI model of a client’s target audience and allows every event concept to be tested before a dollar is spent. Colja describes three eras of event data. The no-data era, when nobody collected anything and success meant a photograph on the front page. The post-data era, when everyone collected data after the event but the world had moved on by the time it was available and even if you ran the same event with the same people six months later the data was essentially useless. And the pre-data era, which is the current moment, where the Digital Doppelgänger allows a client to arrive at an event with actual predictive intelligence rather than retrospective measurement.

A client who runs global events for a major brand told him recently that the tool transformed her relationship with her own board: instead of preparing long presentations to explain why the C-suite’s event ideas would not resonate with the actual audience, she now runs the ideas through the model and lets the data carry the argument. He found this solution deeply satisfying, not because it sold a technology, but because it solved the problem the industry has been carrying since the beginning: everyone thinks they know what the audience wants, and almost no one actually does.

Volkwart Dams passed away on May 19, 2023, a few days after his 85th birthday. He had been a founding member of fwd: Bundesvereinigung Veranstaltungswirtschaft, the principal German event industry association, a member of the German Journalists’ Association for sixty years, and the man whose original question, how do you put something in front of a large group of people that makes them feel something, became the organizing logic of everything his son would build. The Digital Doppelgänger, the AI destination finder, the embedded event managers inside client organizations: all of it descends from that first question, asked in a photography studio in Wuppertal sixty years ago.

Wuppertal is not Frankfurt or Munich or London. It is an industrial Rhineland city of 350,000 people, home of the Schwebebahn, the suspended monorail that has run above the Wupper river since 1901, and the birthplace of Friedrich Engels. VOK DAMS has been headquartered there since the beginning and shows no inclination to move. The credibility is in the work, and the work is everywhere. When Colja talks about where the industry goes next, the answer is always the same underneath, regardless of which specific prediction he is making about technology or geopolitics or the future of the conference format. The room where people are present together is the last thing that cannot be faked, automated, or arbitraged away. He has known this since he was sixteen years old in a children’s hospital in Wuppertal, standing in front of an audience that had not asked to be there, making something real happen between himself and a room full of people who had no particular reason to believe in anything. He has been proving it, at scale, across three decades and three continents, ever since.

The smile is still there. It was never a trick.

GatheringPoint covers the people who build the gatherings. Subscribe at GatheringPoint.news.

1. The Two Hundred Events Nobody Photographs Every corporation has two events everyone talks about and two hundred nobody photographs. The two hundred carry more combined budget and produce more sales leverage than the two that win the trophies. The agency that figures out the two hundred wins.

2. Culture Is Measured by Who Calls You Back Almost half of VOK DAMS clients are former employees who left, built careers at major brands, and then hired the agency they used to work for. People who know exactly how the sausage is made choose to call Wuppertal anyway. That is not a marketing claim. That is a measurement.

3. The Busboy Knew Before the MBA Did The person standing in front of the customer must have the authority to make the decision in real time. The moment they refer back up the chain, the experience has already degraded. Colja learned this not in a business school but in a Chinese restaurant in Florida where a teenage busboy from Wuppertal was the entire customer-facing operation.

4. Everyone Thinks They Know What the Audience Wants The event industry has lived through three data eras: no data, post-event data that arrived too late to use, and now pre-data, where a synthetic model of the target audience tests every concept before a dollar is spent. Everyone thinks they know what the audience wants. Almost no one actually does.

5. AI Will Drive More Live Events, Not Fewer Pain relief and convenience are being automated. Experiences are not. The more the world is simulated, the more the unmediated room is worth.

6. He Called the Three-Zone World Early Going to Beijing in 2004 was not a growth strategy. It was a product quality argument. A brand sending launches to three continents needs genuine local expertise in all three, not a headquarters with a list of foreign contacts. He built for it while others were still debating whether it was real.

7. They Did Not Come for the Seventeen Tracks Nobody came for the seventeen tracks and the five thousand sessions. They came to meet the person standing next to them. The events that understand this are the ones that work.

8. PMA Is a Competitive Advantage in a Country That Defaults to Fear In a country where the ambient mood trends toward fear, choosing to operate from positive momentum is a genuine competitive advantage. Colja learned it from his father, who built an agency from a photography studio at a time when the industry had no name, no association, and no agreed-upon vocabulary, and did it anyway.

9. The Rituals Do Not Need to Be Elaborate A Monday morning global call where someone in Singapore asks if anyone knows a specialist in southern France and someone does. Ice cream on the CEO’s birthday. The most successful office of the year builds the annual program and the junior members run it. Simple structures, applied every week, are what keep a global organization from becoming a collection of independent outposts.

10. Close the Gap Between the Stage and the Seat Why do people attend events? To meet other people. Not because of the brand that invited them, the venue, or the food. The agenda of the person in the seat has almost nothing to do with the agenda of the person who built the stage. Close that gap and you have done something real.

Edible Profile of Colja Dams

Why I Do These

Every leader profiled in the GatheringPoint Wisdom Bank receives an edible portrait from Small Bite Architecture. Four bites. Four sips. Each one a translation of a life into taste.

I started doing this because I believe the gathering economy is ultimately about the senses, and a profile that lives only on a screen misses something fundamental. The people I write about have spent their careers designing experiences that land in the body, not just the mind. The least I can do is return the favor.

The bites are not garnish. They are argument. Every ingredient is chosen for what it means, not just how it tastes. The cocktails distill a philosophy into something you can raise a glass to. Together they are a portrait you can serve at a table, a conversation starter that requires no introduction, and a tribute that disappears in two chews and stays with you considerably longer.

For Colja Dams, the bites begin with a parmesan tuile dusted clean and end with a warm chocolate-chili truffle that delivers a genuine physical shiver. That arc, from the sequence that must be kept exactly right to the unmediated moment no algorithm can produce, is his entire philosophy in four bites.

Why I Commission These Songs

Every leader profiled in the GatheringPoint Wisdom Bank receives an original song. This is not a gimmick. It is a conviction.

I have spent fifty years in the events industry believing that the most powerful things that happen between people happen in rooms, not on screens. A magazine profile tells you what someone built. A song tells you what they believed while they were building it. The two together get closer to the truth than either one alone.

The song for Colja Dams is called Still Making Magic. It is written in the register of U2’s Achtung Baby era, the period from 1991 to 1993 when Bono was making grandiose claims about human connection at arena scale that turned out to be completely correct. Colja was at university during those years. More importantly, the register fits the argument: that the gathering of people in a room is the most valuable thing a human being can engineer, that the small room closes the deal the big room only opens, and that real is the only currency that never goes away.

The song names Colja and Claudia because VOK DAMS is not a solo act. It names BMW, Bugatti, Bayer, L’Oréal, SAP, Telekom, Porsche, and Lamborghini because the philosophy is proven by the clients who trust it. And the bridge lands on three words that are the structural argument of everything Colja has built across twenty-seven years and nineteen offices: the room, the room, the room

He founded ASAE on that idea.

A hundred and six years later, GatheringPoint sat down with Michelle Mason, who runs the organization he built, and asked her to make the case for what ASAE actually does. She said it in one sentence.

Gatherings are not events. They are trust-building machines.

That sentence is the spine of the song you are about to hear. We called it Rubbing Elbows, because that is the method. The elbow, the handshake, the conversation after the session ends, the dinner where someone says something they would never put in an email. That is where trust gets built. That is what ASAE has been organizing for over a century. That is what no algorithm has figured out how to replicate.

The song honors what 50,000 association professionals do every day. The collaboration that moves industries forward. The standards that protect the public. The gatherings that create the conditions for strangers to solve problems together.

Association is a verb. Community is the result.

Emmett Hay Naylor knew it in 1920. Michelle Mason is proving it in 2026. The song is for everyone in between.

The full Michelle Mason Wisdom Bank profile, the companion piece to this song, is at GatheringPoint.news

He founded ASAE on that idea.

A hundred and six years later, GatheringPoint sat down with Michelle Mason, who runs the organization he built, and asked her to make the case for what ASAE actually does. She said it in one sentence.

Gatherings are not events. They are trust-building machines.

That sentence is the spine of the song you are about to hear. We called it Rubbing Elbows, because that is the method. The elbow, the handshake, the conversation after the session ends, the dinner where someone says something they would never put in an email. That is where trust gets built. That is what ASAE has been organizing for over a century. That is what no algorithm has figured out how to replicate.

The song honors what 50,000 association professionals do every day. The collaboration that moves industries forward. The standards that protect the public. The gatherings that create the conditions for strangers to solve problems together.

Association is a verb. Community is the result.

Emmett Hay Naylor knew it in 1920. Michelle Mason is proving it in 2026. The song is for everyone in between. The full Michelle Mason